[knarf]

We live in hidtorical times

[Mariner]

A State can determine how it will select its' Electors.

If they choose to have an election they are bound by innumerable laws and decisions...almost all of which are Federal.

However, a state can ALSO determine how a candidate gets on the ballot. A perfect example of this is the Virginia Primary qualification in which a candidate must obtain a minimum number of signature AND a minimum number from every county in the state.

Now, while the US Constitution has only two requirements for POTUS...Natural Born Citizen...and 35 Years of age...I am CONFIDENT the USSC would uphold Georgia's refusal to put ANYONE on the ballot until/unless they sign a release form for the State to obtain a Certified Copy, under threat of law, directly from the jurisdiction of birth.

This to verify the only two requirements to be POTUS.

Even one state would expose the Fraud.

[Enterprise]

"He said if Georgia does decide to keep Obama off its state election ballots, he won’t appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, “because if he were to lose there, his entire administration would be void, including his appointments to the Supreme Court.”

Lord, give the Judge and the SOS the courage to do the right thing and keep this miserable spawn of hate off the Georgia Ballot.

[Harlan1196]

I am confused. This article says that the judge WILL NOT enter a default judgement - that the Orly and the others refused a default judgement in order to present their evidence.

Did I miss something along the way - I was hoping and praying it was a done deal.

[bert]

The primary question for consideration is which state will be next to follow Georgia’s lead