Posted on 01/27/2012 8:33:05 AM PST by IMissPresidentReagan
Wheeeeeeew....means I got the talking points right, today. I am still in the cult. Major sigh of relief. ;)
RE # 30: Right on, right on.
LOL. I’m certain there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth over this, as well.
this is not just any other election...far from it...we are in 1860 type division
Marl Levin is the only of the big three openly on the offensive against Romney.
Rush criticizes Romney a bit and waxes about the GOP brass and the civil war but then always qualifies it with big picture bs
we are gonna have Gerald Ford forced on us by a smear attack machine the likes I’ve never witnessed in 54 years...this is hardly just another election and Rush is dead wrong if he thinks folks won’t remember and that they won’t remember that he did little to stop it.
Rush Limbaugh...if he can be happy with Mitt Romney...then what exactly does that tell you pray tell?
think about it?
does that mean he is a fellow traveler to us?
it’s not fun to consider is it?
et tu Rushbo is rather a gut stab eh?
Yep, wd.
I agree that Hannity is handcuffed by Ailes.
His primary focus is his family and income.
Rush wimped out yesterday but got alota flack for it. Let’s see how he responds today.
He is so far doing okay in calling out Elliott Abrams lies.
Oops, now it’s “Nevermind, Rush back in tank for Newt! Attacks Newt’s attackers!”
Which of course means he’s really in the tank for Romney.
it’s your thread hon...and I mean you no harm...I’ve had my say and you can have last word.
i will pray...quite literally that Rush stands up and puts on his big boy pants and cowboy hat and actually takes a decisive stand against Mitt Romney and the smear gang...many of whom he has conduit to
we shall see
there is no above it all objectivity in this race...either you support a liberal Mitt or not
bttt
Santorum leaves during every break. ..may be wee wee calls..but could also be his excuse to not have to engage with his opponents.
oh my - did i call him noot?
And yet when he came on, he was quick to say, “I wasn’t defending Newt.” Why not, Rush? He certainly deserved a defense. Mark Levin had no trouble understanding that.
Everything you’re saying now, I read in 2008, except replace Romney with McLame.
To be honest, we’ve become quite like the weather channel, with every election being most divisive, most important election ever, just as every snowflake leads to the worst inch of snow ever on the weather channel.
I think we’ve already lost the battle if we’re that dependent on talk radio hosts’ endorsements.
Just how much impact did Rush’s attacks on McCain have in 2008? Just how much impact did Hannity’s constant revelations about Obummer’s history have on the 2008 election?
If we REALLY wanted a conservative president, WE would have done the hard work back in 2008 until now, changing the primary system; closing the primaries and not letting liberal states like New Hampshire have such an early say. If WE want something; WE need to do it and QUIT depending on others to do what we think needs to be done.
I’ll watch it after Rush. Thanks for the link. Maybe he’s getting senile or losing his mental faculties (whatever he had originally).
The conspiracy kooks are out in force eh?
you whine so much you must still be wearin pull ups....grow a pair
It’s become typical of every election, it seems. Rational discussions are more and more difficult to have. It wouldn’t be so bad if everyone who refuses to acknowledge the faults within the candidate they support now wouldn’t be the first ones screaming for their head when that candidate betrays conservatism. (Remember Scott Brown?)
It's only 4 minutes. You can listen (or watch it) during the top of the hour redundant news weather and traffic break.
Awesome. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.