If there is an actual fact-based dispute about eligibility, the Electoral College (which casts the actual votes) and Congress (which certifies the vote outcome) are responsible for settling the matter. This court has no jurisdiction.
Every State determines elegibility of the candidates on the State ballot. If you don’t understand simple facts you shouldn’t be calling other people crackpots. Of course I don’t think you are going to be around here long enough to be educated on the facts of the case.
The State of Georgia has complete jurisdiction over who is allowed on the ballot for their state primary.
The court sure thought it had jurisdiction to decide whether the candidate could be included on the state's ballot. IIRC such decisions were specifically left to the states by that pesky constitution.
"This court" decides if he is eligible to be on the ballot. If he cannot prove he is eligible to be on the ballot, Neither the Congress nor the Electoral College need to be concerned about him.
If you can't get through the first line of defense, there is no need to use the second line of defense. It is people such as yourself who let him fly through the system the first time around.
There is good cause to doubt Obama's status, too many questions are unanswered, too many claims unproven.
If seeking justice causes hurt feelings or civil unrest it is just too damned bad!
the court and SOS have total juriscdiction, OBOT.
At least in Georgia, the court advises the GA Sec. of State who then allows or disallows inclusion of the nominee on the ballot.
Granted this is seldom necessary but it has happened this way before in other states. And remember, the question of “natural-born” is only relevant to the President and Vice President offices - no other office has this specific requirement.
Hey zotted dumb*** - one of the plaintiffs was a Presidential elector.
He has standing.