Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

No, I think he’s making a valid point. That’s the danger of the NBC argument. In order to make that argument they have to accept that Obama Sr is Obama’s legal father, but to accept that they have to consent to using fraudulent documents as if they were authentic. That sets a precedent. Obama can now say that those 2 fakes were accepted by a judge as authentic.

Unless Malihi rules on Orly’s case first and finds that those documents are not authentic, and then takes judicial note of that for the other 2 cases.

Sheesh. What a mess.


567 posted on 01/26/2012 10:32:08 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
butterdezillion said:

No, I think he’s making a valid point. That’s the danger of the NBC argument. In order to make that argument they have to accept that Obama Sr is Obama’s legal father, but to accept that they have to consent to using fraudulent documents as if they were authentic. That sets a precedent. Obama can now say that those 2 fakes were accepted by a judge as authentic.

This argument is a paradox. Nothing has changed. The judge either will rule in favor of the plaintiffs claiming lineage or against them based purely on statute.

It is far more difficult proving the entire state of Hawaii is corrupt in an administrative court than it is to challenge the defendent on Constitutional face value. This is especially true in a civil litigation. Fraud and corruption are usually left to the DA's office to pursue.

We WANT this court to make a Constitutional claim. That way it can be fast tracked right to the U.S. Supreme Court for an ultimate decision. No other case to date has followed this path.

Always choose the path of least resistance. Our framing fathers did not require paperwork. They only required a test. At this point, the test is very simple to execute.

605 posted on 01/26/2012 10:56:15 AM PST by devattel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion
In order to make that argument they have to accept that Obama Sr is Obama’s legal father

SADO's and Sr.'s divorce could be used to prove Sr. is the father in the eyes of the court. The Kenyan, biological parent or not, is the legal father until someone proves otherwise and has nothing to do with whether or not the BC he was waving in front of the cameras is fake or not.

741 posted on 01/26/2012 12:29:57 PM PST by bgill (The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion

Actually, they could have been presented for the singular proposition that they were offered by O as authentic. Thus, he admits that Sr. was African.


839 posted on 01/26/2012 1:28:01 PM PST by esquirette ("Our hearts are restless until they find rest in Thee." ~ Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson