Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OBAMA ELIGIBILITY HEARING TO BE STREAMED LIVE STARTING AT 0900 EST
Article II SUPERPAC ^ | 01/26/2012 | Article II SUPERPAC

Posted on 01/26/2012 5:55:04 AM PST by RaceBannon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,121-1,1401,141-1,1601,161-1,180 ... 1,461-1,473 next last
To: Brown Deer

“Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.”

I would add the RNC has a LOT of explaining to do as well for the 2008 election. They just took the DNC’s “word,” for his credentials? Pu’lezze...

I’ll put on my tin foil hat here to offer it might have been a conspiracy contrived by the two parties. What else explains it? The RNC knew his father was not a citizen. The RNC had to be aware of the NBC clause in our Constitution.
Yet they determined to ignore it? Why? They thought they could beat Obama, so it didn’t matter? Well, they screwed that up. Or, they were in on it. You decide.

Either way, Obama is not qualified to serve as POTUS. No way no how. I don’t care how the NBC clause is twisted, contorted, misconstrued, or otherwise demeaned, demolished, or ignored. It’s a fact. Obama is not a natural born citizen, which by definition, requires two citizen parents.


1,141 posted on 01/27/2012 11:18:20 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Constitutional Conservatism is Americanism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1117 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Trying to catch up on the thread and read your post about the Zotted Ones and their reaction this week... Got a good laugh out of it. Thank you for that! I wish I could see their shocked faces - this is one thing that Obama has done/not done that appears actually IS “Totally Unexpected”... at least to them. I wonder if they are starting to feel like Clinton’s staffers when he finally admitted he lied about Monica-gate.


1,142 posted on 01/27/2012 11:39:45 PM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kAnzbxbbFQ&feature=player_embedded

Attorney Mark Hatfield Post Eligibility Hearing Public Statement - 1-26-2012


1,143 posted on 01/28/2012 1:14:17 AM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1128 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

“Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”


1,144 posted on 01/28/2012 6:35:09 AM PST by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1140 | View Replies]

To: David
It isn't clear to me what the issues really are on eligibility. I view the argument for ineligibility on the grounds of citizenship of zero's father as without merit. ...

Since you view the argument of ineligibility on the grounds of citizenship of zero's father as without merit

Can you tell me why or what basis you are using to declare a father's citizenship without merit??

1,145 posted on 01/28/2012 6:52:58 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1104 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Obama is not qualified to serve as POTUS. No way no how. I don’t care how the NBC clause is twisted, contorted, misconstrued, or otherwise demeaned, demolished, or ignored. It’s a fact. Obama is not a natural born citizen, which by definition, requires two citizen parents.

It seems clear to me the thought in mind when the framers of the constitution were hammering out the wordage, concerning the qualifications to be president, Benedict Arnold was a definite factor. Eliminate, to the extent possible, divided loyalties.

1,146 posted on 01/28/2012 6:55:42 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1141 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner; Brown Deer

Two reasons the GOP gaffed the Constitution and ignored what they knew to be Obama’s ineligibility:

(1) Marco Rubio

(2) Bobby Jindal

Reason three has materialized since 2008:

(3) Nickki Haley


1,147 posted on 01/28/2012 6:59:02 AM PST by GGMac ((lesson learned re Obie: parse every sentence, every word, every gesture, every photo))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1141 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

My guess is that this verbiage is either a quote or a “fantasy quote” from an Ulsterman like source. Without some idea of the providence of this quote, it is meaningless. If it comes from Ulsterman, well, I don’t trust him much anyway.


1,148 posted on 01/28/2012 7:04:38 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies]

To: visually_augmented

That is pretty much my understanding as well.


1,149 posted on 01/28/2012 7:13:08 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1112 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

If he can’t be bothered to respond to the several inquiries, that’s rather annoying... (Just starting to read this morning so maybe ha has replied.)


1,150 posted on 01/28/2012 7:22:44 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1148 | View Replies]

To: Mimi3

See the separate thread on Rachel Maddow with a short video. He is the head of the Democrats in Georgia.


DNC = Delusional Nut Case


1,151 posted on 01/28/2012 7:26:04 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1130 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Sven often ignores requests for information. He occasionally pops out with an interesting theory, and sometimes he'll provide a little information for tracking down the particulars, but as often as not he won't.

I did a search on some of the verbiage in his message. It didn't come back with any exact matches, but that may have been because the google-Yahoo-etc webcrawlers haven't had a chance to pick it up off of the site where it may have been first posted.

I half expected it to come from an "Ulsterman" or some such. If it turns out to be an actual quote from someone in Obama's legal team, then it is interesting. If it is a made up fantasy quote, then it is just dreck.

1,152 posted on 01/28/2012 7:27:49 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Thanks for the ping and the kind words. :)


1,153 posted on 01/28/2012 7:32:13 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1136 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
I've only worked my way up to about noon on Friday on the Fogbow thread. As of that time they are trying to convince themselves that the failure to show up at the hearing “was all part of a multidimensional chess game that we don't understand...yet...”

Some Fogbowers are even speculating that Obama’s legal team actually WANTS an NBC ruling from SCOTUS and not showing up in GA is part of the plan to get to SCOTUS...because they are so CONFIDENT that MvH will be ignored!

BTW, Rachel Maddow discussed the case with the head of the GA Dem party...

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rachel-maddow-takes-on-georgia-courts-birther-case-against-obama-its-like-dividing-by-zero/

1,154 posted on 01/28/2012 8:09:40 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1142 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp; null and void
"Thanks for the ping and the kind words. :)"

No, thank you for the posting of historical documents and persuasive arguments and analysis regarding the framers' intent. You've a knack for cutting through bs. A rare enough trait in the world today, though examples of such abound at FR.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to get back to working my way through a 2,000+ comment "Auntie" thread I was assigned as remedial reading. I've applied for admission to the Free Republic Initiates' Excellence in Noob Development program, and hope to fast-track to tenure in about four years. ;)

1,155 posted on 01/28/2012 8:44:21 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1153 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
BTW, Rachel Maddow discussed the case

I can't watch him...

1,156 posted on 01/28/2012 8:47:30 AM PST by GregNH (................GO PATS!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1154 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; Seizethecarp
Who in their right mind would name their son Rachel? Or for that matter, Sue?
1,157 posted on 01/28/2012 8:56:21 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1156 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

He got TWO copies of his LFBC, Why is a good question. Is it possible that he planned on making one public until someone realized that the layers were not flattened?


1,158 posted on 01/28/2012 8:57:25 AM PST by GregNH (................GO PATS!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1156 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thanks for the ping!


1,159 posted on 01/28/2012 9:45:28 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1138 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Idiot Bill Bryan aka Foggy fogbow comments the Obama trial. Orly is there.

http://bcove.me/kghk5tjz


1,160 posted on 01/28/2012 10:01:56 AM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,121-1,1401,141-1,1601,161-1,180 ... 1,461-1,473 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson