Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flotsam_Jetsome; All; Obama Exposer; holden; edge919; DiogenesLamp; bushpilot1; philman_36; ...

OBots and their lawyers gets the slap down from the Secretary of State. LoL!

“The Office of Secretary of State
January 25, 2012
VIA REGULAR MAIL & EMAIL

Michael Jablonski260 Brighton Road, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30309michael.jablonski@comcast.com
RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Mr. Jablonski:I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of State Administrative Hearings (”OSAH”) has handled the candidate challenges involving your client and advising me that you and your client will “suspend” participation in the administrative proceeding. While I regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to an administrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.

As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of State’s Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.

In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge.Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.

I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,Brian P.
Kempcc: Hon. Michael Malihi (c/o Kim Beal - kbeal@osah.ga.gov)Van Irion, Esq. (van@libertylegalfoundation.org)Orly Taitz, Esq. (orly.taitz@gmail.com)
Brian P. Kemp”

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/obamas-attorney-jablonski-slapped-down.html


133 posted on 01/25/2012 5:48:09 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

I got to hand it to ya Red Steel. You beat me by 1 minute posting Kemps letter to Jablonski lol.


136 posted on 01/25/2012 5:51:32 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

Nice response...


138 posted on 01/25/2012 5:53:26 PM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

“Peril” is an appropriate word for Obama and his “legal” team.


139 posted on 01/25/2012 5:57:21 PM PST by devattel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

Could it be that when the Sec of State says this in the letter:

“Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision”

is a invitation for Jablonski to enter the COLB into the record for Obama as evidence? It sure seems like it!!!


143 posted on 01/25/2012 6:01:39 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

AWESOME !!!!!!!!!!! WOW !!!!!!!!


152 posted on 01/25/2012 6:13:11 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel; melancholy

Thanks for the Smack Down Ping!


153 posted on 01/25/2012 6:15:54 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

155 posted on 01/25/2012 6:20:21 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

And Jablonski gets owned. Now that is awesomely righteous.

Wait - listen! Do you hear that?! Isn’t that the sound of a usurper’s regime unraveling?

Gitcher popcorn ready and be ready for the gavel-to-gavel coverage tomorrow morning:

http://www.art2superpac.com


159 posted on 01/25/2012 6:31:27 PM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

Thanks.


185 posted on 01/25/2012 8:39:42 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel
"Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision ..."

Is Kemp daring Jablonski to show the alleged LFBC or is he hinting that if he does, that he'll keep Obama on the ballot?? The president supposably has TWO hard copies of the alleged birth certificate, so there should be one available ... one that should have been presented in the motion to quash. Interesting how the Obots have claimed that Jablonski would waltz into court with the LFBC in hand, yet he's doing everything he can to avoid it. Hmmmmmm.

199 posted on 01/25/2012 10:19:48 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson