Good point! Everyone should be reminded.
Posted on 01/25/2012 2:39:58 PM PST by Obama Exposer
As Jerome Corsi said when they produced the PDF file, “they blinked”.
Introduce a forgery or play golf. LoL.
bookmark
You suggest that BHO’s birth certificate is a serious problem. May be. But something tells me that EVERYTHING in this joker’s background is a crippling liability. (soc. sec. record, passport(s), college transcripts, etc.)
Since 2008 the MSM has ignored and pooh-poohed this story. More recently, there have been an increasing number of public observations indicating that Obama does not think and act like an American.
Well, DUH!
Too bad, nobody has ever found the video
Was it Polarik? Or Fred?
not me...all I kept hearing was...he might have said it, but it wasn’t recorded.
Anyway, here's how it looks to me.
The Sovereign state of Georgia has requested a very simple set of documents, easily obtainable. Obama has decided to insult the SOS and ALJ of Georgia, and all its people, and has decided to politicize the qualification procedures in Georgia. As a side issue, he has also decided to attack the state of Arizona and its Sheriff with Fast and Furious and illegal immigration.
This is looking pretty ugly for the president: THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS ATTACKING SEVERAL STATES OF THE UNITDED STATES OF AMERICA.
My reply on Mr. K's thread.
This is hysterical.
Nobody was prepared beforehand for this issue in '08. By the time appropriate action was taken it was too late to correct the problem.
Now that people are aware of the issue, what should be a simple matter for any presidential candidate to resolve has become a running joke about one particular presidential candidate.
“Dear Judge. We don’t like what’s happening. Put an end to it. We won’t be participating. Shove it.”
An excellent summation! :)
I was just made privy to a very important piece of research I had not previously been aware of. It comes by way of a comment forwarded to me by the author of the h2ooflife blog:
“I had presumed that the idiom “natural born citizen” appeared nowhere in U.S. Law other than A2S1C5, but I found it in administrative law and it is contrasted with native and naturalized citizenship. I’ve never seen any mention of this fact before and wonder how many are aware of it in the ineligibility camp. Here’s the quotes:
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45104/0-0-0-48602.html
He then quoted two provisions from the link provided, but there’s actually three at the official INS “.gov” site which establish official recognition by the federal government that native-born and natural-born should be separately delineated. When you visit the suggested link to the Immigration and Naturalization service, it brings you to “Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.”
Interpretation 324.2 (a)(3) provides:
“The repatriation provisions of these two most recent enactments also apply to a native- and natural-born citizen woman who expatriated herself by marriage to an alien…” (Emphasis added.)
Then, Interpretation 324.2(a)(7) provides:
“(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.
The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.” (Emphasis added.)
And again, Interpretation 324.2(b) provides:
“The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status if naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen, as determined by her status prior to loss.” (Emphasis added.)
:) Jablonski is making making Taitz look like Perry Mason.
Might ought to remind the SOS that a good man, COL. Lakin, was allowed to go to jail as well!
No. Just Twitter them to the judge..... ala Judge Robertson, who was going to sanction John Hemenway for having the audacity to expect a legal process to decide a legal issue.
The only evidence of Obama’s Hawaii birth that the HDOH has produced is the 1960-64 birth index with his name in it.
Which they had deliberately altered so that it would include legally non-valid records...
>>> :) Jablonski is making making Taitz look like Perry Mason. <<<
Paging humblegunner, please answer the white courtesy phone.
I still luv ya’ Gunny. ;o)
Good point! Everyone should be reminded.
Ping.
~~~~~~~~~~
You have been suckered by the "birth certificate" smoke and mirrors. The BC is merely an Øbozo misdirection ploy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.