Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Happy Valley Dude
"He certainly shows no concern for the humanity of the people that are here," Gingrich said.

So, how many of you pro-Gingrich folks are going to turn against him, now that he called a hardline illegal immigrant stance "inhumane".

And remember, Gingrich said this on a spanish-language show. Not that he is going to be pandering to special-interest groups or anything, no that won't happen.

3 posted on 01/25/2012 10:31:08 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Like it or not, most people don’t support hardline stance on illegal immigration.

Sealing the border? Yes.
Deporting most illegal immigrants, especially dangerous ones? Yes.
Tracking down and deporting every single one? No.


9 posted on 01/25/2012 10:39:08 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Look. Like it or not, Newt said “millions will go, millions will stay”. And he’s right.

He is for an enforcement first multi step plan. Not some “Comprehensive” stew where most of the best ingredients are forgotten about.


12 posted on 01/25/2012 10:41:29 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

hardline illegal immigrant stance “inhumane”

And it’s hard to characterize Romney’s stance as “hardline”. He just suggests he would enforce the laws and who even knows if he’d do that once he’s in office?

Newt and those working for him really have cut the legs out from Republican positions. There is plenty to criticize Romney about but his business success (which I happen to admire and think should be a great asset from a Republican perspective) and his rather reasonable stance on immigration shouldn’t be included in such criticism.


15 posted on 01/25/2012 10:43:30 AM PST by Catphish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“So, how many of you pro-Gingrich folks are going to turn against him, now that he called a hardline illegal immigrant stance “inhumane”.”

Not me. There is no other candidate to turn towards.


20 posted on 01/25/2012 10:52:11 AM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I have no delusions about Newt. I know what I am getting with him plus and minus. I just think Mitt has more negatives and has zero conservative accomplishments. I remember when the FR was abuzz over Bush's NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND and his lack of support for choice. My response was he was not a school choice candidate and he made it clear he would reproduce the TEXAS model on a national basis. So my further response was, what is your beef? But I still supported him because it was Bush or McCain.
40 posted on 01/25/2012 11:15:29 AM PST by 11th Commandment (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: All; CharlesWayneCT
So, how many of you pro-Gingrich folks are going to turn against him, now that he called a hardline illegal immigrant stance "inhumane".

Romney's "anti-immigrant" comes from his hypocrisy. While he vetoed a specific in-state tuition bill, as governor he counter-proposed free college for students scoring a certain level on the high school exit exam without regard for legal status. His Rat legislature got him out of that one claiming it would advantage too may wealthy students. He employed illegals at his own home and even when caught allowed his gardener to keep the same illegals for another year until he was running for POTUS.

As an amoral vulture capitalist, he likes illegals more than real immigrants or real Americans.

The anti-Newt knotheads ignore his proposals which start with border control by a date certain and include the specific sorts of enforcement measures that AZ and others have passed.

Everyone of those critics with questionable motives focuses on the very last idea which won't even be considered before all the other steps are taken to completion and that's creating a review process for those who haven't left on their own, have registered as required, haven't been deported, have a long history and deep community ties.

Romney's trying to pander to activists like some born-again bigot. For the GOP's sake, and all our sakes, I hope he does not succeed. His tactics failed in CA in the mid-90s and turned that state permanently blue with the rise of Hispanic voters.

63 posted on 01/25/2012 12:04:59 PM PST by newzjunkey (a FL win returns Romney to the "inevitability" path.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson