Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
I have no delusions about Newt. I know what I am getting with him plus and minus. I just think Mitt has more negatives and has zero conservative accomplishments. I remember when the FR was abuzz over Bush's NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND and his lack of support for choice. My response was he was not a school choice candidate and he made it clear he would reproduce the TEXAS model on a national basis. So my further response was, what is your beef? But I still supported him because it was Bush or McCain.
40 posted on 01/25/2012 11:15:29 AM PST by 11th Commandment (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: 11th Commandment

DOn’t get me wrong, Newt vs Romney is no contest for me. I’m currently trying to decide if I’d support Paul over Romney (I do believe though that if Newt had burned out, we’d be a pro-Ron-Paul site now).

Given that we are going to have Newt, I wish we’d spend less time defending him, and more time pointing out where he is wrong and getting ready to pull him back to the right on the issues that matter to us.

I guess others think this is too early, because he could still lose, and I respect that. But it’s not like what we say here matters, this is inside game, and I’d like to see us be honest about what we need to hold Gingrich to the fire on, like that he has to stop attacking conservative positions and adopting liberal talking points. I don’t think that is too much to ask of the guy we’ve decided to accept as the conservative alternative for President.


50 posted on 01/25/2012 11:28:19 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson