Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: napscoordinator
I thought it made for a more professional debate. No screaming or interrupting the speakers.

I agree.

It actually was better to have the debate without the interruptive Ra Ra Pep Rally each time a candidate responded to a question.

The debate is to elicit candidate responses, not elicit populist hoopla from the audience.

==

Gingrich complaining about the debate format is reminiscent of Gingrich complaining about setting at the back of AF1 when Clinton was president:



Conservatives are trying to sell the 'angry Newt.' While it may be cutzie now for the Newtbots, it won't be in the general election.
40 posted on 01/24/2012 8:41:00 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy; Jim Robinson
It actually was better to have the debate without the interruptive Ra Ra Pep Rally each time a candidate responded to a question.

The debate is to elicit candidate responses, not elicit populist hoopla from the audience.

==

Gingrich complaining about the debate format is reminiscent of Gingrich complaining about setting at the back of AF1 when Clinton was president:

{pic snip}

Conservatives are trying to sell the 'angry Newt.' While it may be cutzie now for the Newtbots, it won't be in the general election.
Well, the only complainers are the ones whose candidate didn't get positive reactions from the previous debate.. Even Paul got some positive feedback from that one.

When the audience reacts, as it did in the previous one, it tells the viewers, and especially the candidates up on stage, WHAT the issues are and WHAT the public feels and HOW they think.

Anyone that says it is a waste, is going in with both eyes (and ears) shut.
84 posted on 01/24/2012 9:09:36 AM PST by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy

Ok, I see what this is.

The Newt bashers are just looking for something they can try to attack him on.

For a moment, I thought that was meant to be a serious post.


120 posted on 01/24/2012 9:29:39 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy

If you want to push your candidate, I am sure that would be more welcome than attacking others’.


130 posted on 01/24/2012 9:35:22 AM PST by Grunthor (I don't vote for Democrats, this includes Mitt Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy
Gingrich complaining about the debate format is reminiscent of Gingrich complaining about setting at the back of AF1 when Clinton was president:

Cool.

A Freeper citing Democrat propaganda circa 1995.

210 posted on 01/24/2012 10:23:44 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy

So, you buy into the liberal media when they printed that. You’re a gullible idiot.


235 posted on 01/24/2012 10:37:30 AM PST by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson