Whether or not a speaker is inspirational is not something that is “valid” or “invalid.” It is a matter of opinion.
And my opinion is based on Newt’s history and the conduct of this campaign.
NO ONE would even give Newt a second’s look until we were all out of other choices. Why? Because he’s not inspirational.
Revving people up in a “hit him again, Joey” way is not inspirational, in my view.
There are no memorable soundbites from any of those long hours Newt droned on in previous years. Nothing wrong with that. But, in my view, that’s evidence that he’s not an inspiring speaker.
Finally, the fact that one can deliver a speech without a teleprompter doesn’t equal “inspiring,” either. LOTS of people can do that; in fact, most people in “speaking fields” can. But inspiration comes from ideas and the ability to paint them in words. Simply speaking without a teleprompter doesn’t necessarily get you there.
That's like saying "ALL" and it's always wrong. I was for Newt Gingrich, long before most here.
I find his speeches inspirational, and you don't. That's also a matter of opinion, but that doesn't make yours valid or mine invalid.
That's like saying "ALL" and it's always wrong. I was for Newt Gingrich, long before most here.
I find his speeches inspirational, and you don't. That's also a matter of opinion, but that doesn't make yours valid or mine invalid.