[fightinJAG]

BTW, don’t you find it rather crybaby-ish to complain about rules against audience participation?

Had that participation been going against Gingrich, I’d wager he’d be all about the “dignity” of the occasion and how “it’s not a sporting match.”

Threatening to pull out of the debates over this is way over the top.

Let’s see if Newt will back up his mouth with action if the rules are not changed.

[mkjessup]

BTW, don’t you find it rather crybaby-ish to complain about rules against audience participation?

Oh in Pyongyang, definitely so.

Had that participation been going against Gingrich, I’d wager he’d be all about the “dignity” of the occasion and how “it’s not a sporting match.”

You're the real expert on Newt I see. You got a degree in that my FRiend?

Threatening to pull out of the debates over this is way over the top.

It is becoming apparent that the NYT headline suggesting Newt would 'boycott' the debates based on the inability of the audiences to participate is (as are most NYT stories) a LIE.

Let’s see if Newt will back up his mouth with action if the rules are not changed.

So just to get you on the record JAG, who are you supporting?

[toddly]

Newt said nothing like what this blogger is reporting. Watch the video.

[MEG33]

He did not say this.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2837086/posts?page=99#99

THE HEADLINE IS WRONG!!!