Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinJAG
BTW, don’t you find it rather crybaby-ish to complain about rules against audience participation?

Oh in Pyongyang, definitely so.

Had that participation been going against Gingrich, I’d wager he’d be all about the “dignity” of the occasion and how “it’s not a sporting match.”

You're the real expert on Newt I see. You got a degree in that my FRiend?

Threatening to pull out of the debates over this is way over the top.

It is becoming apparent that the NYT headline suggesting Newt would 'boycott' the debates based on the inability of the audiences to participate is (as are most NYT stories) a LIE.

Let’s see if Newt will back up his mouth with action if the rules are not changed.

So just to get you on the record JAG, who are you supporting?
233 posted on 01/24/2012 10:36:12 AM PST by mkjessup (A loser to a loser who now endorses that loser is a loser. <-- iow, NO Romney, No WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup; fightinJAG; TomGuy
It is becoming apparent that the NYT headline suggesting Newt would 'boycott' the debates based on the inability of the audiences to participate is (as are most NYT stories) a LIE.

Isn't it great to see Freepers pushing NYT propaganda. /

253 posted on 01/24/2012 10:45:47 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson