cite for as long as I can remember. It even says...WAITE, C.J., Opinion of the Court right at the top.
“It would be interesting to hear the MSM ask about or mention the following:
“Minor v. Happersett”
These words seem to be the 3rd rail in the MSM-sphere right now. They will not touch it.”
They will avoid discussing Minor for as long as possible, because that simple definition of NBC is impossible for him and his enablers to wiggle out of. That’s why over two dozen cases related MvH were jacked around on Justia.com prior to the 2008 election. Whomever is responsible for that bit of chicanery knew the importance of that case vis a vis the definition of NBC.
Either he’s telling the truth about his origins and he’s shown to be automatically constitutionally ineligible to hold office based on his foreigner father, or the entire life narrative that “Obama” has sold to the world is shown to be complete garbage. Either way, he’s screwed if the story gets legs, which I think it’s beginning to. Been seeing LOTS more MvH citations around the web.
cite for as long as I can remember. It even says...WAITE, C.J., Opinion of the Court right at the top.