You give a very specific reaction you assume them to have, but yet, when faced with the Sedition Act, which directly infringed upon a liberty - Speech- specifically mentioned in the Constitution (travel is not a specific of the Fourth Amendment, and current jurisprudence has detailed the fact that when you willingly leave the comfort of your home into public, you voluntarily lessen your privacy interest stake laid out in the Fourth Amendment.)
I do find it telling that you failed to actually reply to the historical specifics I tendered, and instead whined about the “lameness” of my response. As far as I'm concerned you can go wring your hands in the corner elsewhere, because you are the one with nothing to offer but ridiculous and inane hypotheticals about people you've neither met, nor will know.
Yep, we’re done. Waste your own time, you can’t have mine.