“Obama must love this.”
No, he is having nightmares about the possibility of facing Gingrich.
There are many who will join the fight—the MSM will take Mittens side to destroy Newt before he upsets the apple cart. IF Newt gets the nod it will be a real long shot—I fear the lies and slander will not be enough and they will be reduced to taking Newt out with a bullet—he better watch his back or he could end up like George Wallace.
Yeah, I heard some RATagandist on the tube talking about how Obama's dream opponent is Newt.
Of course since RATs always lie about everything, that means you're probably spot on.
The only problem is that one or more debates between the Republican and Democrat nominees is not a requirement. There is no law that demands one or more debates. 0bama would be well advised to simply skip any one-on-one debate against Speaker Gingrich. Why in the world would 0bama give up the advantage of incumbency and risk it on a debate performance that 0bama might win (and secure the election) or draw (and likely still win) or lose (and risk the election)? It seems that only bad things (from the 0bama perspective) can happen following a Gingrich-0bama debate. Anyone remember Mayor Rizzo in Philadelphia? “I’m not going to debate you Thatch. No one knows you Thatch!”