Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Controlling Legal Authority
Not if you look at history. The presidential election typically is a referendum on the incumbent or his party, not on the individual challenger. However, not many grasp this concept so your ignorance is excused.

B.S.

Squeaker elections aren't referendums at all.

1960 was a squeaker, still too close to call today.

1964 was a referendum on Barry Goldwater, not LBJ.

1968 was another squeaker, not a referendum at all.

1976? Another squeaker...Carter by 2 points...but none of this is the point:

The point is that Ted Kennedy couldn't have beaten Gerald Ford; Phil Crane, Howard Baker or GHW Bush could not have beaten Carter; and Alan Keyes and Orrin Hatch would have lost to Al Gore.

It is your ignorance and your stupidity which are excused. LOL.

94 posted on 01/21/2012 11:22:59 PM PST by Chunga (Ron Paul is a fruitcakey jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Chunga

If I meant to use the word mandate, I would have used that word. The word “referendum” does not necessarily mean a landslide. In all of those elections people were voting for or against, basically, the status quo. I didn’t say that each election would be a landslide one way or another.Obviously, Some elections are closer than others.

And regarding the one landslide you mentioned, do you really think any of the Republican candidates would have beaten the successor to the martyred JFK? Dream on.

And by the way, don’t forget that Gore won the popular vote. Bush was very, very lucky to have won that election.


104 posted on 01/21/2012 11:55:16 PM PST by Controlling Legal Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson