Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chunga

If I meant to use the word mandate, I would have used that word. The word “referendum” does not necessarily mean a landslide. In all of those elections people were voting for or against, basically, the status quo. I didn’t say that each election would be a landslide one way or another.Obviously, Some elections are closer than others.

And regarding the one landslide you mentioned, do you really think any of the Republican candidates would have beaten the successor to the martyred JFK? Dream on.

And by the way, don’t forget that Gore won the popular vote. Bush was very, very lucky to have won that election.


104 posted on 01/21/2012 11:55:16 PM PST by Controlling Legal Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Controlling Legal Authority
Your premise is incorrect. It does matter who runs as the challenger in a presidential election.

Al Gore would have slaughtered Alan Keyes. George Bush defeated him.

Jimmy Carter would have slaughtered Harold Stassen or John Anderson. Ronald Reagan trounced Carter soundly.

Gerald Ford would have trounced Governor Moonbeam. Jimmy Carter squeaked by.

Your statement,

I think the odds on beating Obama won’t be affected that much by who the Republican candidate is

is ignorant and dead-wrong.

109 posted on 01/22/2012 12:10:34 AM PST by Chunga (Ron Paul is a fruitcakey jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson