“You just want to find a way to bash Newt and get away with it.”
Ridiculous statement. Please point out on this thread where I’ve bashed Newt! Darksheare said it best with regards to what I and many other posters wish to do:
“discussing the merits or demerits of the individual candidates.”
Is this no longer allowed when it comes to Newt? A simple yes or no answer is all that’s being asked. If even questioning a position a candidate has made is forbidden then Jim Robinson should just say so. I and others on FR who wish to remain will thus keep our queries to ourselves. Whether that’s healthy for a discussion board and a candidate for elective office is another story.
“Please point out on this thread where I’ve bashed Newt!”
You have a terrible time with reading comprehension. Seriously. Your reading level is that of a second grader.
I never said you bashed Newt, I said you keep looking for ways to do so.
“A simple yes or no answer”
What part of my reply, “Jim has made his position PERFECTLY clear: FR will not be used to bash Newt. Period”, is so unclear that you cannot understand that it means “No!”?
Seriously, I feel like I am talking to a child.
Me: “No, you may not have a cookie.”
Child: “Can I have a cookie if...”
Me: “No cookies. Period.”
Child: “What if...”