Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: epithermal

What I don’t understand is why Canada needs a pipeline for crude to the gulf for refining. For the same money, Canada could build its’ own set of refineries, become a real player, and sell the fuel anywhere.


17 posted on 01/20/2012 10:57:29 AM PST by edboock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: edboock
I don't get why we don't just build a refinery near the border there . Is it harder to get a permit for one refinery than it is for a pipeline that crosses states
and country's borders?
37 posted on 01/20/2012 11:30:35 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Congress: Looting the future to bribe the present.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: edboock

Canada may not have the workforce for refineries....


39 posted on 01/20/2012 11:36:45 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: edboock
What I don’t understand is why Canada needs a pipeline for crude to the gulf for refining. For the same money, Canada could build its’ own set of refineries, become a real player, and sell the fuel anywhere.

There is a refinery capacity glut, particularly among refineries that refine the type of heavy crude produced from the Alberta oil sands. Those refineries are located on the Gulf Coast, their feedstock being largely Venezuelan heavy crude.

That said, Obama's obstructionism certainly strengthens the case for a Canadian refinery. I don't know how far an Alberta refinery is from being feasible.

A business is not going to wager that Obama will lose the election, so Trans Canada would only start construction on those segments that are feasible on their own.

45 posted on 01/20/2012 11:54:50 AM PST by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson