[Just mythoughts]

So this woman marries a man she carried on an affair with while he was still married? It really seems strange to read one side of a marital dispute as though there is only one offending party.

AND for that reason I find her less than credible. Because from where I sit Newt led the country to a Republican controlled Congress after 40 years of wandering in a liberal wilderness.

I read NO shame on her part of participating in the adultery upon wife number 1. AND the manner in which she speaks of him attempts to make herself a victim of which I see NO grounds. And she is offended when it is she that got offended. I hope Newt does not respond.

Now having said the above, I have my own issues with Newt. Him preening on that couch with Nanny the RED PEWlouise and for him spouting that the era of Reagan was over as if liberalism had won still bounces off like electric charges in my head.

But Marianne would have better served herself had she kept her peace.

[flaglady47]

That’s right. Keep your rose colored glasses on. The word hypocrisy comes to mind from the alleged “social conservatives”. Social conservatives, my foot. Hypocritical social conservatives, yes. All that outrage against Bill Clinton’s affairs, but none for Newt’s, eh? Disgusting hypocrisy.