How do we prevent homosexual morality’s USA becoming an ancient Greek man-boy culture of sex?

Saint Damien Advocates ^ | January 17, 2012 | John P. Roco

[John Roco]

The gay agenda is pervasive; ‘it is everywhere:’ Brokeback Mountain, La Cage aux Follett, Log Cabin ‘republicans,’ democratic party powerhouses, numerous library books- all seemingly unstoppable. It is almost as if Kinsey, who wanted to ‘push the envelope,’ won- with his ‘observations’ of sexual behavior of his college students, and in depth interviews of homosexual pedophiles. Kinsey is the one who came up with the continuum of sexual preference from gay to straight- seemingly through his intense observations of the results of sexual abuse on male minors by his pedophiles.

But how do we stop this immorality?

This nation, the USA, was built with references to our Creator as well as emphasis on the rights of the individual. But at what point do the rights of gays and homosexuals to ‘pursue happiness,’ cross the line of forcing all of us ‘into the fulcrum’ of their world. Already gays and homosexuals boast of obtaining access to all of the unwanted foster, adoptive children. ‘Own all of the nation’s orphans’ is already a mantra. Of course, if it was, ‘babysit all of the children,’ and all childcare facilities were required to have gay men on staff to ‘expose children to a healthy non-discriminatory environment,’ we would all be up in arms. Right now, though, with HR 1681 and S 1770, ‘Every Child Deserves a Family Act,’ the end result would be that no foster or adoptive child could choose to go to a non-gay or non-homosexual home.

The gay agenda is organized.

Just google ‘log cabin republicans;’ in fact, in their ‘split and divide’ policy, they have won. What just 25 years ago were the ‘Reagan conservatives’ is now totally split. Are you a ‘fiscal conservative?’ Oh, I was looking for a ‘social conservative.’ Before, there was no differentiation. The ‘Log Cabin Republicans’ produced this differentiation by forming themselves, then wanting to be ‘added on’ to events; they also from radio self-reports of their own activities, would join republican parties ‘incognito’ spreading their lore. When I heard the terminology ‘religious extremists’ in my republican party referring to those who were ‘social conservatives,’ I knew something was amiss. That, my friends, was direct infiltration.

What do we do?

Obviously we are civilized, unlike some other religious groups that demand ‘termination of existence.’ All have a right to live, but they do not have a right to assert their beliefs on the rest of us and take over our culture and eventually in 50 years from now, have their perfect little ancient man-boy sex culture (obviously, this all was going to begin with HR 1681 or S 1770, ‘Every Child Deserves a Family Act). Again, we behave as a Christian nation (while still observing as many religious leaders, Christianity’s roots in Judaism- the father religion) and treat Homosexuals and gays who want this ultimate transformation, as ultimately and unfortunately people whose minds have been perverted- literally. In a straw hat survey university estimate, 90% of the gays reported being sexually molested (did the other 10% just forgot?).

They are victims.

This group knows nothing else than those behaviors inflicted upon themselves. Of course, as of my psychology background I know also- that in biology there are cases where ‘in-betweens’ can happen- naturally- as the case in my own textbook, where someone is born with both female and male genitalia. So we do not blame them for what they are, but take pity on them, while at the same time vigorously defending our culture from being dominated by the ancient Greek man-boy sex cultured world they want. This is difficult, as obviously all outlets of media- TV, movies, YouTube, internet, books, radio, major media outlets- are dominated by the propagation of a world that 50 years from now (or sooner) is exactly what they want- complete fulfillment of the perverse sexuality they want everywhere around. Only by producing equivalent and even greater amounts of media in all realms- to counter their efforts, can we succeed in knowing that our great grandchildren will be able to grow up in a truly moral world, as the founders of the Declaration of Independence intended. Yes, we allow them to be as they are; no, we do not allow them to dictate our USA culture to become perverse, and yes we take pity on them, too.

[Neoliberalnot]

The primary source of influence are the homosexual writers in hollywood who promote this deviance to the public. Oddly, same-sex rape of young boys is rampant in homowood.
CNN: Corey Feldman: Biggest problem in Hollywood is pedophilia
According to former child star Corey Feldman, child molestation is rampant in the entertainment industry, as he told Nightline in an interview.

“The No. 1 problem in Hollywood was and is and always will be pedophilia,” he said Wednesday. According to Feldman, the “casting couch” exists for children, too.

Feldman asserts that directors and other adults in the industry take advantage of young aspiring actors on a regular basis. “It’s all done under the radar... But it’s the big secret,” the 40-year-old said.

Feldman also claimed that former co-star Corey Haim’s death last year was the end result of sexual abuse by an unnamed “Hollywood mogul.” Feldman said that his friend’s substance addiction was “a symptom” of the molestation he experienced.

The actor previously revealed to GQ that he was raped by his assistant as a child. “It’s something that will be addressed in my inner soul for the rest of my life, and it’s something that truly affects me,” he told the magazine.

Is this a surprise to anyone? Merely homomsexuals seeking the object of their loving obsession. They now seek to enter and preach to kids from 1st grade up about the magnificent qualities of a progressive lifestyle.

[donna]

You’ll notice now that the subject is on your mind.

[kearnyirish2]

“it is that we cannot STAND the thought of the underprivileged and racial minorities being cared for!”

That’s spot-on! “Fiscal conservatives” (as opposed to “conservatives”) want the only free things for blacks to be their abortions and sterilization procedures. The genocide carried out by our abortion policy doesn’t bother them at all...

[allmendream]

Conservatives don't care about the color of someones skin.

Fiscal conservatives want a government of limited and enumerated powers and think such social engineering government expansion nannystate idiocy is counterproductive leading to a culture of dependence rather than fostering self reliance.

I am a fiscal conservative and I don't want free (i.e. government paid for - interesting how completely you have adopted the language of the left) abortions or sterilizations as such is NOT in furtherance of any limited and enumerated power granted to the Government.

Apparently both you and the left are in total uncritical agreement that those of us arguing for a limited government are not ideologically motivated by our foundational principles and ideology - but by racism.

Double disgusting. With “friends” like you already behind the wire it looks bad for conservatism in the upcoming ideological battle.

[kearnyirish2]

I’m a conservative, with no qualifiers. “Fiscal conservative” is Yankee-speak for “RINO”.

[af_vet_rr]

Then you are too young. American men never used to hug. There’s a reason for the change.

When did this happen, because I remember my brother hugging some of his high school buddies when he got back from his first tour in Vietnam. And I can remember in the late '50s, my dad hugging one of his buddies from WWII at the airport that he hadn't seen in years. I was watching a show the other day about V-E Day showing soldiers and sailors hugging back in 1945.

If you want to argue that people hug for just about any reason these days, I won't argue that. But to say that American men never used to hug is foolish.

[allmendream]

You are not a conservative at all in the sense of wanting to conserve what is left of our Constitutional government of limited and enumerated powers.

Apparently you think social engineering nanny state cradle to the grave government dependence is a good thing - and that the only reason anyone would oppose it is racial animosity.

Do you similarly think that anybody who opposes illegal immigration is heartless and also possibly motivated by racism - or do you accept actual ideological conservative thinking on why illegal immigration is not such a good idea?

[little jeremiah]

This article is relevant to the topic, very much so:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2834496/posts?page=24

Begin Sex Ed in Kindergarten, Says New ‘National Standards’ Report
CNS News ^ | January 17, 2012 | Elizabeth Harrington

Posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:32:42 AM by Sopater

By the time they leave elementary school, children should be able to “define sexual orientation,” and by the eighth grade be able to “define emergency contraception and its use,” according to a report containing controversial new recommendations for sex education in U.S. public schools.

---

THe whole articles is on FR. Well worth reading. The educational system is basically turned into a grooming service for pedophiles, especially faggots. And of course “clients” for Planned Parenthood “services”.

[danielmryan]

Accusing me of avoiding the issue that a society that gives the commoner a voice in the law can/will open it up to gross moral abuses?

Far from it. I called it a dark path because the alternatives to democracy have proven to be worse - in some cases, much worse.

"Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time. "
- Sir Winston Churchill

[donna]

I didn't say the man-hug was just invented recently. You remember those hugs because they were rare.

I think American men are hugging all the time now days and I think it is because they are getting comfort from each other instead of from women like it used to be. Feminism and the gay lobby working in unison.

Soon, they'll be holding hands like Islamic men do. The gay military will lead the way.

[HiTech RedNeck]

you dog

[HiTech RedNeck]

Band of Brothers? or Banned of Brothers?

[hinckley buzzard]

It was also a fairly narrow window in time, and it wasn't even all of Greece. More of an aberration than a norm. But Greeks will always be saddled with this localized and peculiar anomaly it seems.

[hinckley buzzard]

To the larger issue, the antidote to homosexuality is close but non-erotic bonding among men. Scouts as they used to be. Athletic teams. Hunting and fishing lodges with memberships. All the intermediate structures the skeevey Left and their feminazi whores have been trying to destroy these last forty years. If you think about it, you can see why the Left is pro-homosexual--it feminizes the male population and renders them ambivalent about their masculine aggression.

Don't be taken in by PC bullshit. This is at the core of the drive to homosexualize the military, and to emasculate the culture generally.

We know from the reparative therapy research, the one universal element missing from the homosexual's lifestyle is a solid age-appropriate close nonsexual relationship with other guys. And that is just what the enemy seeks to delegitimize.

[hinckley buzzard]

It would be wise not to be seduced by casual observation, anecdote, and the spew of ignorant celebrities. It would also be wise to keep this issue in perspective. We are still talking about at most, 3-4% of the population.

Toddler boys engage in "suspicious" behaviors all the time, like trying on mom's underwear and so forth. The variety of curiosities is unlimited.

There is no evidence that such behaviors leads to homosexuality. Likewise, there is no evidence that homosexuality is something one is "born with." It just isn't there.

No doubt there is the occasional hormonal anomaly,(I had a colleague in grad school who created "five sexes" of mice, depending on the hormonal mix she added to their placentas) but these are special cases and not sufficient to explain what is clearly a cultural aberration.

[kearnyirish2]

I made no reference to the Constitution; I believe in God’s law. I also made no reference to “social programs”. “Fiscal conservative” is simply code for “tight-fisted liberal”.

Illegal immigration is a huge problem in this country; it is as bad as the “legal” immigration by which Asians are imported to drive down white-collar salaries.

[cherry]

yes...a culture that encourages promiscuity,early prepubescent indecent dress and behavior, and vigorously protects caustic and immoral movies,music,magazines etc can hardly be strong against the homosexual agenda....

the old Hooters argument......people are so quick to dismiss this kind of crap ala "family restaurant" as meaningless when in reality, its another signal to our youth: be big busted (get a boob job) and you're on you're way because that really is all that is important, your big boobs, and boys, don't bother being boy scouts or altar boys..and dads, don't you encourage them either....let them start gratifying their sexual desires in middle school...why wait...

[allmendream]

Again you differ from an actual Conservative.

Conservatives want to protect and defend and conserve our limited government of enumerated powers as outlined in the Constitution.

You don't accept the Constitution.

Social programs are the ones you are saying “fiscal” conservatives oppose because they are racists. You know all the ones BESIDES abortion and forces sterilization that you made reference to.

Conservatives also care nothing for skin color, you seem downright obsessed with it.

You have uncritically adopted the thinking and language of the left on this. Conservatives are not against the nanny state because of ideology, they and you argue - but only because they are racists and don't want to see non-whites get cared for.

You are a Statist of a different stripe than the secular Statists - but you are NOT a Conservative. Your ideas on government are much more aligned with them - the only difference apparently is you want a nanny State following “God's law”.

Triple disgusting.

[Neoliberalnot]

The homos are driving the agenda to satisfy their disgusting obsession with other people’s children. Even the muslims realize what these deviants are up to.

[utahagen]

“We need to be as supportive of boys like that as the left is, and as we are of kids with other disabilities. It is NOT the fault of coddling parents who didn’t punish them enough. That is like saying that masculine boys were taught to be the way they are. They aren’t. They just are that way.”

I agree. I know that gays prey on boys and that that is devastating and can turn boys gay because they respond so easily to physical overtures that they could believe that that “means” they are gay. However, I believe gays choose more delicate boys who are less likely to fight back or who themselves have gay tendencies. (No, no, no: I am not saying it's the child fault!)