Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

I made no reference to the Constitution; I believe in God’s law. I also made no reference to “social programs”. “Fiscal conservative” is simply code for “tight-fisted liberal”.

Illegal immigration is a huge problem in this country; it is as bad as the “legal” immigration by which Asians are imported to drive down white-collar salaries.


76 posted on 01/18/2012 8:53:10 PM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: kearnyirish2
Again you differ from an actual Conservative.

Conservatives want to protect and defend and conserve our limited government of enumerated powers as outlined in the Constitution.

You don't accept the Constitution.

Social programs are the ones you are saying “fiscal” conservatives oppose because they are racists. You know all the ones BESIDES abortion and forces sterilization that you made reference to.

Conservatives also care nothing for skin color, you seem downright obsessed with it.

You have uncritically adopted the thinking and language of the left on this. Conservatives are not against the nanny state because of ideology, they and you argue - but only because they are racists and don't want to see non-whites get cared for.

You are a Statist of a different stripe than the secular Statists - but you are NOT a Conservative. Your ideas on government are much more aligned with them - the only difference apparently is you want a nanny State following “God's law”.

Triple disgusting.

78 posted on 01/19/2012 7:06:45 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson