To: xzins; Hoodat; P-Marlowe; wmfights; 1010RD; chuckee; VinL; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; Jim Robinson
Not so, Hoodat. Read the following from Murdoch's conservative paper, the NY Post: This line of attack is so insidious. Did the business do anything illegal, no! When the business failed we have a bunch of people come out and say the business owners should have sacrificed everything to protect their way of life. I don't buy any of this and think this line of attack on free enterprise is going to backfire and get the one guy we don't want the nomination.
305 posted on
01/14/2012 9:15:42 AM PST by
wmfights
(PERRY 2012)
To: wmfights; xzins; 1010RD; chuckee; VinL; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; Jim Robinson; wagglebee
This line of attack is so insidious. Did the business do anything illegal, no! Is abortion illegal?
NO!
So I guess we can't criticize doctors who use abortion as their business model.
As long as what they are doing with their business is legal, then who are we to condemn them?
That line of attack is insidious.
308 posted on
01/14/2012 9:22:35 AM PST by
P-Marlowe
(Romney. The poster boy for Corporate Welfare and Vulture Capitalism.)
To: wmfights
This line of attack is so insidious. Did the business do anything illegal, no! When the business failed we have a bunch of people come out and say the business owners should have sacrificed everything to protect their way of life.The most insidious part about it is that the business didn't fail. It came out of its reorganization and blossomed. In 2007 when the company was sold to Siemens, the company was valued at $6.4 billion. Not bad for a company that was only worth $440 million when Bain Capital took over.
311 posted on
01/14/2012 9:25:23 AM PST by
Hoodat
(Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson