Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red_Devil 232
There are “inaccuracies” in the ads? What are they? The article does not elaborate or even explain them. Nor does Newt.

It's been a while since I saw the ads, but the one thing that I remember that struck me as inaccurate was a claim that Newt supports amnesty for 11 million illegals. I think that is a gross exaggeration of his position and don't blame him for taking exception to it.

Newt has made clear through his lawyers letter to tv stations that he considers the claim he was fined $300,000 for ethics violations to be false. Newt claims he was not fined, but was asked to reimburse for the cost of the investigations. His basis for this is lost on me, the sanction was clearly reported as a fine when it happened and as I recall Newt did admit wrongdoing and apologize.

17 posted on 01/13/2012 10:45:52 AM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: freespirited

No! No! Newt is asking the PAC supporting him to remove “inaccuracies” in their ads about Romney. I was asking what are those specific “inaccuracies” in those ads?


35 posted on 01/13/2012 12:27:08 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson