Posted on 01/13/2012 9:01:33 AM PST by Biggirl
wait, what ? you mean el Rushbo tellin Newt all week attackin capitalism in the stupid manner the pac commercial did was un republican?
crap...........now we will get 72 or 50 more trolls today
well it is friday the 14th
No, I don’t think he is campaigning for Romney. He is friends with Newt by the way.
This thread is a pre-school playground. You regs turn it into that. Now, go ahead and spell troll backwards, etc., and all the silly things that go on when someone outside the group appears. It’s really one of the silliest things I’ve seen here at FR. Ya’ll have a nice chat with each other on the ‘Rush Limbaugh Show’ thread.
“No, I don’t think he is campaigning for Romney.”
Hey, Snerdly, is that you?
Good grief; thank heavens the media wasn’t embedded with troops in ww2, or else we’d all be speaking German.
At least the Marines didn’t make the Tali-whackers form into a naked pyramid!
What about Santorum’s defense of Romney?
“It’s this hostile rhetoric, which unfortunately – I don’t want to stand here and be a defender of Mitt Romney, but unfortunately even some in our party now, even some running for president will engage in with respect to capitalism,” Santorum said to a town hall of nearly 200 people. “It is bad enough for Barack Obama to blame folks in business for causing problems in this country. It’s one other thing for Republicans to join him.”
I’m 3 years younger than you and not surprised by the way things are progressing with these hosts. If Rush comes out 100% for Mitt then yeah, that’s a cause for concern. Now I just see it as he and others like Sean Hannity are pointing out the pros and cons of each candidate.
well, that explains the mirrors on my shoes
...He knows that true conservatives are gunning for him for his performance this week; hence, the first call wasn’t until almost half way into the show, and the first half of the show was exclusively devoted to irrelavant filler....
Me too. Unless Limbaugh spends some more money on producing and playing some entertainment, like the parodies and Paul Shanklin songs, and gets off shilling for Romney, I’ve about had it with him.
“Hey, Snerdly, is that you?”
Seriously, that’s all you have?
“What about Santorum’s defense of Romney?
“It’s this hostile rhetoric, which unfortunately – I don’t want to stand here and be a defender of Mitt Romney, but unfortunately even some in our party now,...”
Guess we know which “consrvative” has already sold out and is angling for VP or some other Cabinet position now.
Nope.
So true, so true.
Don't forget Jim Demint.
Jim DeMint offers defense, not endorsement, of Mitt Romney
But in Newtard's minds that really means they both are in the bag for Mittens.
the charge that bain capital did anything wrong is false
your irrational hatred of romney has you grasping at any straw you can find - even a LIE about bain
that is every bit as irrational as people that support obama
and to bash anyone and everyone (including rush) that is rational enough to point out the lie - makes you a fool
there are good reasons to dislike romney - bain is not one of them
we don't need hysteria and lies
Each of the candidates are flawed, in multiple ways. Each of the candidates have strayed from conservatism at some point. We should place our conservative values on a pedestal, not people. It's sad to see some who are just as caught up in the cult of personality as 0-bots. Each candidate has their own cult following within their respective supporters’ camps. The camp that floods FR on any given day depends on the poll numbers. I pledge my allegiance to the flag, to America, and to conservative principles. While I may entrust a particular candidate to carry out said principles in a more conservative fashion than another, I do not blindly follow any politician. I love, love, love Sarah Palin. Her endorsement swayed me 0% in the Kentucky Senate race. I did not vote for the candidate she endorsed, and I didn't stub up and say she was a Rino whore for not endorsing my candidate. We need to focus on PRINCIPLES not people.
Thomas Sowell, whom I guess some would call a "Newtard," stated clearly recently that Gingrich is obviously a much better candidate than Romney.
I'd prefer people to rationally admit and accept that Capitalism is separate from morality, that it thrives best when the folks who practice it are moral. Capitalism creates productive entrepreneurs like Bill Gates. Capitalism also creates a kind of capitalist who invests money and takes risks of a different kind, such as ticket scalpers and dot-com name domain buyers who add zero services and produce zilch, but who inflate prices and make their profit solely by leeching off the work and investments of others.
THIS IS A REALITY OF CAPITALISM, and it's okay with me -- if people choose to make a living by being professional pains-in-the-ass, that's their choice, and they are working lawfully within the definitions of capitalism. But only stupid pigheaded blindness fails to see that this particular breed of "capitalist" has low character. Just because you're a capitalist doesn't mean you're noble.
Newt is perfectly right and justified in attacking Romney's version of "capitalism," and Rush is being a starry-eyed idealist by closing his eyes to the truth of it.
Haha. It is what it is.
“Nope.’
Good to know Nancy.
Here’s some more if you dare to read it Romneybot.
http://spectator.org/blog/2012/01/13/romney-corporate-welfare-bum
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.