It would be nice to see SCOTUS take the case, rule against the EPA and hold the person who chose to make the decision personally responsible for any expenses this couple became saddled with in order to protect their property.
I think this is an extraordinary notice by the Justices to the EPA that they better revise their actions immediately since SCOTUS is very clear with this, that if the case comes to the Court later the EPA won't like the outcome. 'With prejudice' ...
If I’m not mistaken the EPA sued the couple for $40 million dollars!!! Incredible. I salute that couple for not backing down and yes, whoever is responsible should go down!
“It would be nice to see SCOTUS take the case, rule against the EPA and hold the person who chose to make the decision personally responsible for any expenses this couple became saddled with in order to protect their property.”
I doubt very seriously if anyone will be held personally
accountable. The question is whether the EPA will abide
to the SCOTUS ruling. With the in session recess appointments
going on, I wouldn’t put it past the regime to tell the
SCOTUS to go spoon a goose.
They did take the case. It was argued today. But, as I explained above, the issue before the Court isn't whether the property is a wetland or not; the issue is whether they can sue the EPA to get an answer to that question before they build on the property.
I wonder which neighbor is cozy with the EPA...