Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

I guess I don’t understand what is wrong with what he said. Of course there have to be limits: committing crimes over the Internet, sending threats, etc.

I don’t think Santorum wants to limit free speech, rather he’s probably taking the above into account.

Having said the above, there might be language buried in the proposals that might be troubling...don’t know.


6 posted on 01/09/2012 10:20:56 AM PST by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KJC1

You can find out what is wrong with the bill with a simple search. Santorum is a big government “conservative”, like the Bushes. I’ll vote for him if I have to because of he position on life, but if it weren’t for that he would just be another Romney.


15 posted on 01/09/2012 10:29:51 AM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: KJC1

There are already limitations on committing crimes, terrorism, fraud, making threats, etc. over the Internet. You can actually go to jail right now for Internet stalking. In fact, there are already laws against piracy (stealing intellectual property).

There is no need for this law and it can only harm the free exchange of information.


27 posted on 01/09/2012 10:51:17 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: KJC1
I guess I don’t understand what is wrong with what he said.

Rights are not unlimited, I guess that would include the right to life hmnnnn.

54 posted on 01/09/2012 11:58:38 AM PST by itsahoot (Throw them all out! Especially the Frugal Socialists who call themselves Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: KJC1
I guess I don’t understand what is wrong with what he said. Of course there have to be limits: committing crimes over the Internet, sending threats, etc.

I don’t think Santorum wants to limit free speech, rather he’s probably taking the above into account.

Having said the above, there might be language buried in the proposals that might be troubling...don’t know.


There are already laws against software and music and movie piracy, but SOPA is not about piracy, it's about controlling what you do or say on the internet. It has fancy language designed to make it look like it's just about piracy, but it also has deliberately vague language that makes it all to easy to shut down websites.

It would take minutes to get a site like Free Republic shut down, and Jim Robinson would have an incredibly hard and probably expensive time in getting it back online, since he would have to appeal to multiple authorities, all of whom might turn him down or ignore him.
58 posted on 01/09/2012 2:49:23 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson