Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LuvFreeRepublic

It’s a great point you raise.

The question becomes do the majority of voters support the Gay agenda or are they opposed?

One thing which is never discussed is the difference between being Gay and the Gay agenda. Like so many other agenda’s in our society, most of the specifics of this agenda are actually just a means to promote the Liberal ideology, the same (current) Liberal ideology which has been so supportive of certain Islamic societies, who’s penalties against Homosexuality have severe penalties, including death.


80 posted on 01/06/2012 8:49:21 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Rational Thought

And how well do you think Santorum’s opposition to birth control will fly with women? Somebody tell me how, please.


84 posted on 01/06/2012 8:57:49 AM PST by adc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought

Romney’s goons have not let loose on this issue yet because they need Santorum and Newt to split the anti Romney vote. Liberals are already all over it. If Santorum ends up being THE anti Romney candidate, all heck is going to break loose on this issue because the Romney goons will go after him. Romney will keep his hands clean like he did when the Romney goons went after Newt. While many people have similar positions to Santorum on this issue, they will not risk voting for him over Romney, and risk the general election. As far as your question does the majority support the Gay agenda or not. I am hearing it is not high on people’s lists of concerns. National security and the ability to put food on the table are main concerns.


90 posted on 01/06/2012 9:05:44 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic ( (I am angry and that is why I am #withNewt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson