Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

What reason is there to think Romney would be any different RE ObamaCare than Obama? If Obamacare is the bottom line, then it seems about 99.99% guaranteed that we’d have it under Romney, since he was responsible for creating and implementing its model! And CERTAINLY Republicans in Congress would have MORE influence in preventing Obama than in preventing Romney from seeing it move forward.


738 posted on 01/08/2012 8:58:14 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies ]


To: Finny

We have to just disagree. We aren’t getting anywhere.

It doesn’t matter if Republicans have more influence in preventing Obama. Obamacare is law. There is nothing to prevent. We can’t “prevent” it. We have to undo it. That can’t be done unless the Republicans have 2/3rds majorities in both houses, after counting the RINOs who might vote not to overturn.

I don’t know that Romney will sign an Obamacare repeal. I just don’t know. I know for a fact that Obama will not repeal Obamacare. That is 100% ironclad non-arguable fact. Even you would agree that Obama will not repeal Obamacare.

That leaves me with a slim chance that Romney would be made to. Not voluntarily, but dragged kicking and screaming.

Now, why would I think that is possible?

Romney and Obama seem different to me. Obama is a communist with deep convictions. He doesn’t blow with the wind. He wants communism, pure and simple, and he fights for it even when it hurts him politically.

Romney seems like a classic go-along RINO. He seems like the type that of political whore that, when talking to liberals, he is “liberal” and when talking to “conservatives” he is “conservatives. When leading liberals he is for abortion and gay marriage and socialized medicine. When leading conservatives he is for tax cuts and job growth and the constitution. He is a political whore.

That is how I see it. I know you disagree. So we should leave it at that.

Now, I have explained it six ways from Sunday what my opinion is and I’ll summarize it just this once more.

#1 - Obamacare is the end of America if not repealed.

#2 - There is zero chance Obama will repeal Obamacare.

#3 - There is some chance greater than zero that Romney can be made to repeal Obamacare (In My Opinion.)

#4 - Should it turn out that Romney can’t be forced to repeal Obamacare, we are not worse off with Romney than Obama, since Obamacare is the end of the American Republic, hence nothing else matters like abortion or education or taxes or free speech, since the tyrannical communist outcome for all of those things is a given anyway once Obamacare destroys the US economy and US society.

#5 - Therefore, if the vote comes down to Romney vs Obama, it is my unwavering opinion that the best course of action is to vote for Romney and hope and pray he can be FORCED to repeal Obamacare

In summary: Obamacare must be repealed to save America. Obama will never repeal Obamacare. Therefore, any option other than Obama can never be worse for Obamacare than Obama, and has some slime chance to be better than Obamacare.


740 posted on 01/08/2012 10:00:20 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Repealing Obamacare is the ONLY GOAL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies ]

To: Finny

OK, let me try this last example so you clearly understand my thinking.

Would you want to play Russian Roulette with a loaded revolver? No you wouldn’t.

Romney is a loaded revolver, like a 6 shot revolver loaded with 3 bullets. The odds are very slim that you will survive if you play Russian Roulette with the Romney Revolver with 3 cartridges in the 6-shot cylinder.

Obama is like a Colt .45 automatic with 3 shots in the magazine. Every single shot from it will shoot out a bullet. There is no chance of an empty shot with a pistol like a Colt .45 auto.

You wouldn’t want to play Russian Roulette, but if you were FORCED to do so, and if you had to choose between using a loaded auto pistol or a 1/2 loaded revolver, which would you use?

The auto pistol has a 100% chance to blow your brains out while the half-loaded revolver only has a 50% chance of blowing your brains out.

So my logic tells me to play Russian Roulette with the 1/2 empty Romney revolver than the Obama pistol which is certain death.

Get it?

That is my opinion. I understand your opinion. In your opinion, both pistol and revolver are fully loaded and both have a 100% chance to blow your brains out. This is why it is impossible for us to agree. We don’t agree on the lethality of the Romney revolver and so have no basis to ever agree.


741 posted on 01/08/2012 10:07:04 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Repealing Obamacare is the ONLY GOAL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson