Obama’s HI COLB is prima facie evidence he was born in Hawaii on Aug 4, 1961.
The key to understanding Obama’s eligibility problem is that his Original Long Form BC has a “date accepted” Aug 8, 1961 and his COLB has a “date filed” Aug 8, 1961. The difference is due to an edit, update or change in the record since the original record was created.
The HI DoH records administrator can lawfully change, edit or update a birth record if a Court Order is issued. A court Order was issued when the Soetoro adoption was annulled.
The HI DoH has several birth records for Obama on file.
1) Original Long Form BC with a “date accepted” Aug 8, 1961, sealed and archived by the Soetoro adoption
2) The Barry Soetoro COLB with a “date filed” Aug 8, 1961, sealed and archived by the annulment of the Soetoro adoption.
3) The Obama COLB with a “date filed” Aug 8, 1961 created after the Soetoro adoption was annulled and the BHO’s Sr. rights were restored as the birth father.
Obama’s ineligibility is due to the fact he used the naturalization process to restore his U.S. Citizenship after he turned 18. When his SSN was filed for it was filed by his legal guardian located in Connecticut. As a Permanent Resident Alien, Obama was entitled to obtain a SSN.
So where and when did Obama natuaralize?
Not true if the document has been altered or is a forgery. Disagree?
The key to understanding Obama’s eligibility problem is that his Original Long Form BC has a “date accepted” Aug 8, 1961…
What is your evidence for commenting about anything depicted on the “Original Long Form BC”? Have you seen the document?
Obama’s ineligibility is due to the fact he used the naturalization process to restore his U.S. Citizenship after he turned 18.
What evidence supports any claim there was a naturalization process?
What is the basis for contending that one born in the U.S. who lost citizenship while a minor by action of a parent, but who was later naturalized, is ineligible as to the NBC requirement of being born in the U.S.?