Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Just stopped by to wish everyone a happy new year, and also to give you some info I gleaned from Twitter:

1. Iran fired a medium range ballistic missile successfully in the Gulf this morning. (Source, BBC)

2. Matthew Down was on one of the networks this morning and said that “Iowa picks the loser.” Since Dowd supports Romney, I assume the internals aren’t quite as good as the media polls.

3. Slate has an article showing how very unreliable the current polling system is, and how the internal polls of the campaign are much better. Motto: Pay no attention to polls.

4. I expect Perry to do much better than the media is indicating. The CNN correspondent there in Iowa said he has almost 2000 people from Texas who drove up to help, and he has more precinct captains than anyone. Media is ignoring the importance of organization in Iowa. They were supposed to have snow there last night. Weather is going to be a factor.

I am off to a New Year’s Day antique auction. Best wishes to all of you, and may this year see better times for our country!


114 posted on 01/01/2012 7:59:49 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple; All

Hope everyone has a great 2012 and that all our dreams come true.

Which, of course, is impossible since we have different dreams.

But we all hope to increase the number of real conservatives and increase our majority in the House.

We all hope to take over the Senate and never see Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi again as long as we live.

And we all hope to defeat Obama and put a conservative in the White House.

So, good luck to us !!!


117 posted on 01/01/2012 8:04:23 AM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

In watching some of the Iowa appearances by Perry, Santorum, and the other candidates, it looked to me like Perry’s crowds were heavily “senior” or older crowds, compared to the others. I wonder how this will play out in the voting, or if it means anything in particular?


126 posted on 01/01/2012 8:19:39 AM PST by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

Buy some antique fishing gear for me MM!!


140 posted on 01/01/2012 8:30:04 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

Thanks MM, for that.

Those polls seem so askew, they can’t possibly be accurate. They are paid to sway public opinion. The internals are likely much more accurate.

I don’t see Romney getting 1/4 of that Iowa vote no more than I see Ron Paul coming in second. I too suspect Romney’s not showing all that well.

I’d be okay with Perry and do hope he zooms ahead. I’d be okay with Santorum and also Bachman, frankly.

My choice for now is Newt but I’ll not bore with why. Y’all can read about, here.

Not an Endorsement but a Good Case for Newt
http://patfish.blogspot.com/2011/12/thinking-about-newt-and-other-political.html

But it’s no mind....save I really, really don’t want Romney, please please don’t let it be Robo-Romney.

The rest can be set straight if need be.


146 posted on 01/01/2012 8:36:20 AM PST by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson