[Fishtalk]

Thanks MM, for that.

Those polls seem so askew, they can’t possibly be accurate. They are paid to sway public opinion. The internals are likely much more accurate.

I don’t see Romney getting 1/4 of that Iowa vote no more than I see Ron Paul coming in second. I too suspect Romney’s not showing all that well.

I’d be okay with Perry and do hope he zooms ahead. I’d be okay with Santorum and also Bachman, frankly.

My choice for now is Newt but I’ll not bore with why. Y’all can read about, here.

Not an Endorsement but a Good Case for Newt
http://patfish.blogspot.com/2011/12/thinking-about-newt-and-other-political.html

But it’s no mind....save I really, really don’t want Romney, please please don’t let it be Robo-Romney.

The rest can be set straight if need be.

[altura]

I would be okay with Newt if only because I think he would be an effective candidate and if we elect enough conservatives to congress to hold his feet to the fire, he would be an okay president.

I would be less okay with Santorum or Bachmann as I don’t see them running good campaigns against Obama.

Ron Paul is not worth discussing, his crazy little following aside.

I keep forgetting Huntsman is running.