Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Bravado about the US Fleet invulnerability, its ability to strike, and protect itself should harken back to 2007.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492804/The-uninvited-guest-Chinese-sub-pops-middle-U-S-Navy-exercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html

An ACC battle group is now nearing a trillion dollar investment meant for waging warfare from afar, and doing battle with conventionally-armed combat techniques. The last 10 years of Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere have shown us that classic warfare isn't operative any more. Swarms, UAVs, and other kill vehicles are in vogue and damned difficult to defend against.

Open waters, far, far away is where they should be with 24/7 air patrols armed with the nastiest FABs, Clusters, and wide area disperal weapons imaginable are called for.

If we lose a Kitty Hawk because of this, we cannot replace it unless the Chinese will loan us the money. If anyone here thinks the Chinese aren't helping Iran, go back and see who's been looking at the Sentinel.

44 posted on 12/30/2011 12:17:08 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
If we lose a Kitty Hawk because of this

Actually, we already lost the Kitty Hawk (and all the Kitty Hawks, for that matter).

But it was due to old age. ;-)
47 posted on 12/30/2011 1:47:10 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson