Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AMERICAN RIGHT TO LIFE REJECTS RON PAUL'S PLEDGE
Alaska Native News ^

Posted on 12/29/2011 8:10:29 PM PST by mnehring

American Right To Life calls it politics as usual when Ron Paul tried to mislead pro-life voters by signing a pledge that he actually rejects. Just in time for the 2012 Iowa caucuses Paul pledged that he will "endorse legislation to make clear that the 14th Amendment protections apply to unborn children." But then he contradicted his pledge by stating, "I can't agree that the Fourteenth Amendment has a role to play here."

"Shockingly, Ron Paul agrees with the central finding of Roe v. Wade itself," says Darrell Birkey, director of research for American Right To Life, "that the constitutional protection of human rights does not apply to unborn children." And Birkey adds, "Ron Paul as president would defend a fictitious right of states to legalize the murder of children, but any country that permits kids to be intentionally killed is not even civilized."

"Ron Paul is not who he claims to be," says Lolita Hanks, president of American RTL. "Paul is pro-choice, state-by-state. He believes states should be allowed to keep abortion, which is like allowing states to keep slavery." Thus as president, Paul would refuse to enforce the 14th amendment, which declares, "No State shall… deprive any person of life… without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." (See more at AmericanRTL.org/constitution.)

"Today's pro-life movement is strong and growing, not weak and willing to accept whatever we can get," says Hanks. "We're not going to swoon because Ron Paul or any other candidate merely claims to be pro-life. Either Ron Paul will use governmental authority to stop the slaughter of children, or he is just another worthless politician." SOURCE American Right To Life


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; elections; moralabsolutes; prolife; rino; ronpaul; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

1 posted on 12/29/2011 8:10:38 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mnehring

This in and of itself is enough for anyone to back away from him. I think he is dangerous!!!!


2 posted on 12/29/2011 8:13:54 PM PST by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
You must hate the constitution!!! /sarc.
3 posted on 12/29/2011 8:17:07 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I always thought that the Dennis Kucinich nuts were bad but it seems we have far more of them on our side.
Argh....
RON PAUL! RON PAUL!!!!!!!!......Yea right you frigging morons.
Ross Perot, Ross Perot!!!!
WooHoo!!


4 posted on 12/29/2011 8:24:41 PM PST by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Now you just know that one or more of paul’s great defense team is gonna say exactly that. And after that, we’ll be told that we are simply to stupid to understand a great conservative mind like ron paul’s.
ron paul, streetcorner gynecologist.


5 posted on 12/29/2011 8:29:34 PM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

and too too


6 posted on 12/29/2011 8:30:55 PM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

“.......he is just another worthless politician.”

That is exactly what he is.


7 posted on 12/29/2011 8:33:23 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/Palin-West-2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

..but, but, Ron Paul was a combat OBGYN in Vietnam who delivered the only bi-racial baby in the history of the universe.


8 posted on 12/29/2011 8:33:23 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

“.......he is just another worthless politician.”

That is exactly what he is.


9 posted on 12/29/2011 8:33:31 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/Palin-West-2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I believe that the 14th Amendment should be construed to protect the unborn.
The question I have is this. How can the Supreme Court prevent states from allowing it?
It’s not like an unborn child can take the mother and Dr. to court to get an injunction.
The only way to do this is for Congress to make it a federal crime to violate the civil rights of the unborn.
A reversal of Roe would essentially leave it up to each state absent protections for the unborn passed by Congress.


10 posted on 12/29/2011 8:34:02 PM PST by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; shield; seekthetruth; pollywog

Makes me wonder how pro-life conservatives can support him?

More from the Americans for Life site:

http://prolifeprofiles.com/ronpaul

Excerpt:
Ron Paul wants to be pro-life but is officially pro-choice state by state, and so contradicts himself and wrongly assumes that states’ rights supersede human rights, concluding that a state like California has the right to permit abortion. But the right to life is God-given so there can be no ‘right’ to decriminalize child killing.


11 posted on 12/29/2011 8:37:26 PM PST by JulieRNR21 (*OMG ...means Obama Must Go in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
RE:"Shockingly, Ron Paul agrees with the central finding of Roe v. Wade itself," says Darrell Birkey, director of research for American Right To Life, "that the constitutional protection of human rights does not apply to unborn children."

Now come on, the central (made up) find of Roe was that the freedom to have an abortion is a US constitutional right. That is why it nullified all state abortion laws on the books. If all it did was what was stated above abortion would still be illegal in many states.

12 posted on 12/29/2011 9:02:50 PM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

Ron Paul is a right-wing Lyndon Larouche.


13 posted on 12/29/2011 9:04:56 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (No Mit Sherlock. No Mit, not now, not ever. | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: mnehring

10,000 dollars Right to life is backing Romney.


15 posted on 12/29/2011 9:39:07 PM PST by littlesorrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: littlesorrel; Jim Robinson
10,000 dollars Right to life is backing Romney.

You can pay that bet to the next FReepathon, I'll ping Jim so he can follow up with you on payment. American Right to Life has also failed Romney. They have Bachmann and Santorum as the best candidates.

http://americanrtl.org/node/125

16 posted on 12/29/2011 9:44:22 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
(Dr.) Ron Paul needs to stop self medicating.
17 posted on 12/29/2011 9:44:36 PM PST by TheCause ("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: littlesorrel

zot. you lose.


18 posted on 12/29/2011 9:49:28 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: littlesorrel; darkwing104; 50mm; Old Sarge; 230FMJ; A.Hun; abigailsmybaby; AFPhys; Aircop_2006; ...
10,000 dollars Right to life is backing Romney.

Another WRong Paulist bites the dust. ZOT!

To be added or removed from the Viking Kitty/ZOT Ping List, FReepmail Darkwing104 or 50mm.

19 posted on 12/29/2011 9:59:50 PM PST by 50mm (Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
"Shockingly, Ron Paul agrees with the central finding of Roe v. Wade itself,"

Ron Paul is a feeble-minded boob who thinks the world of himself. His worshippers commonly say things like "If you support the Constitution you HAVE to support Ron Paul," which is a non-starter.

I can't stand him.

20 posted on 12/29/2011 10:03:11 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Is it really time to go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson