Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobinMasters

Not surprising to me. Probably more than any other candidate, Romney makes this race a referendum on Obama’s presidency.

We nominate Newt, Santorum, or another clearly conservative candidate, this election becomes about ideology, something we are significantly less likely to win on.

For myself, I still plan on voting for Newt, but I won’t fool myself that there isn’t a trade off here.


17 posted on 12/29/2011 7:31:57 AM PST by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Pack Knight

Agreed that there is a trade off here. There are a lot of soccer moms that pulled that lever for Obama in 2008 that won’t pull that lever for Newt. They might for Romney.


48 posted on 12/29/2011 7:47:13 AM PST by SteveAustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: The Pack Knight

So then why wouldn’t we nominate Hilary? If beating Obama is the only goal. I think there’s no point in beating Obama if we aren’t going to change his policies. People need to get the “personal” out of this election. I don’t hate Obama, I hate his policies. It’s a truly pathetic retreat if we’re now going to be afraid to run a campaign on our ideology. Sounds like the death of conservatism to me.


84 posted on 12/29/2011 8:02:37 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson