Skip to comments.
Medical Journal Article:
14,000 U.S. Deaths Tied to Fukushima Fallout
Radiation Public Health Project ^
| Dec 19, 2011
| Joseph J. Mangano
Posted on 12/28/2011 7:41:33 PM PST by Veto!
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
I live in eastern WA State. Cannot find measurements for my location. I wonder why these have never been published. If you have other sources, please post to this thread.
1
posted on
12/28/2011 7:41:40 PM PST
by
Veto!
To: Veto!
They've never been published because they are meaningless.
To: hinckley buzzard
Well that is nothing, there has been 17,357 deaths due to truck vibrations when they pass over bridges. And wait until you hear what is the result of trains passing by.
Then there is Congress.....
3
posted on
12/28/2011 7:47:29 PM PST
by
stubernx98
(cranky, but reasonable)
To: Veto!
Yeah sure, give me some names of these people
This sounds like the phantom 40,000 dying each year from 2nd hand smoke or 50,000 from coal plants or the numerous others people BS death liberals make
4
posted on
12/28/2011 7:47:50 PM PST
by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: hinckley buzzard
Bingo!
14,000 deaths? Some degrees (credentials) should be taken back before this is over. This is total bull-s**t.
5
posted on
12/28/2011 7:47:57 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Santorum..., are you giving it some thought? I knew you would.)
To: Veto!
Check out the subject
radiation hormesis. There is some evidence that low-dose radiation actually activates radiation-protective genes.
6
posted on
12/28/2011 7:49:36 PM PST
by
NoPrisoners
("When in the course of human events...")
To: hinckley buzzard
They've never been published because they are meaningless.
Could you perhaps elaborate a bit on that? I find this one paragraph a bit more than meaningless:
"The CDC issues weekly reports on numbers of deaths for 122 U.S. cities with a population over 100,000, or about 25-30 percent of the U.S. In the 14 weeks after Fukushima fallout arrived in the U.S. (March 20 to June 25), deaths reported to the CDC rose 4.46 percent from the same period in 2010, compared to just 2.34 percent in the 14 weeks prior. Estimated excess deaths during this period for the entire U.S. is about 14,000."
That may not be a demonstrable cause and effect at work, but it is damned curious.
7
posted on
12/28/2011 7:49:49 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
To: Veto!
As with most anti-nuclear reports, the conclusions and the data are fabricated.
8
posted on
12/28/2011 7:51:46 PM PST
by
G Larry
("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
To: Veto!
Bogus Bogus Bogus
Do a search and list the credentials of the International Journal of Health Services.
9
posted on
12/28/2011 7:52:07 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(If you don't like growing older, don't worry. You may not be growing older much longer: T. Sowell)
To: hinckley buzzard
Please explain.
I hope they’re meaningless, because Boise having 200 x the normal level of
radiation is scary. Here in the inland NW, weather patterns have been bizarre, with huge storm clouds rising up from Japan to Alaska and then almost straight down over Spokane and on down to Boise. A few days after Fukushima, local news reported high levels of radiation, then all news stopped.
10
posted on
12/28/2011 7:54:10 PM PST
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: Veto!
Name ONE. Seriously. One person in the USA who died as a direct result of the Fukushima Fallout.
In the 1980's there were news reports which claimed that thousands of homeless people were starving to death every day. Yet, the same newspapers never had a single story of a specific homeless person dying of starvation.
To: Veto!
14,000 in the US from one accident across the pacific? So how does that meet the smell test with only 11,000 worldwide from over 500 above ground nuke tests worldwide?
Between 1945-1980 there were over 500 atmospheric nuke blast tests all around the world. The CDC and NCI claim that worldwide it resulted in 11,000 deaths. That too was iodine-131 radiation.
http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10621
To: NoPrisoners
Hope you’re right, because between years of dental X-rays and now Fukushima clouds over my head, I’m darned near glowing in the dark. Is that a good thing?
13
posted on
12/28/2011 7:58:26 PM PST
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: Veto!
The lady on the catering truck had asked me if I was taking any precautions due to the then-imminent arrival of said fallout here on the west coast. I politely laughed. This is even more hilarious. If I were not of the moral character I would have made a mint on the pills and geiger counters.
These doctors should be stripped of their licenses and the Journal shuttered.
I have enough swamp land and bridges, doc. Thanks! But if you buy a Coke you can save the polar bears.
14
posted on
12/28/2011 7:59:08 PM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: mkjessup
To: mkjessup
I find this one paragraph a bit more than meaningless:
Seriously? OK. Here goes. A person died by falling off a ladder. This report would chalk up that person's death to Nuclear Fallout from Japan. A person chokes to death on an undercooked turnip. This report chalks up that person's death to Nuclear Fallout from Japan.
"Excess Deaths" were already up year-to-year by 2.34 percent in the 14 weeks prior to the Earthquake. So it stands to reason that "Excess Deaths" fluctuates by several percentage points for no apparent reason.
This same non-logic has been used to "prove" that eggs cause heart attacks or that global warming kills baby polar bears.
Personally, I'm willing to blame every single one of the 14,000 deaths on the American Recovery And Reinvestment Act of 2009.
To: Veto!
What the hell does “peer-reviewed” exactly mean anyway?
That you have had the other like-minded, tenured progressives at your State-funded University reach the same pre-determined conclusions????
17
posted on
12/28/2011 8:07:03 PM PST
by
PGR88
(Sic transit gloria mundi)
To: oneamericanvoice
Even so, I’d like to see an official disclaimer that says the Pacific Northwest is totally free of radiation from Japan. We’re certainly not free of debris from Fukushima washing up on our shores, some of which “may be radioactive.”
18
posted on
12/28/2011 8:09:14 PM PST
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: Veto!
Hope youre right, because between years of dental X-rays and now Fukushima clouds over my head, Im darned near glowing in the dark. Is that a good thing? Yes. When the electricity goes out in the middle of the night, you don't have to try to remember where you left the flashlight.
19
posted on
12/28/2011 8:09:38 PM PST
by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: Veto!
If this were true, as radiation would disipate as it moved eastward (maybe by the square of the distance or the cube) then we should have well over 1 million deaths in Japan and islands like Guam, Samoa, and others should have had 5-10% of their populations wiped out.
20
posted on
12/28/2011 8:10:23 PM PST
by
LukeL
(Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson