Posted on 12/23/2011 7:46:44 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Disillusion with the current field of Republican presidential candidates, combined with an increase in the number of states using proportional representation, has led some Republicans to talk more about the possibility of having a brokered convention. How likely is it that no candidate will have a majority of delegates by the time the Republican convention starts? Not very likely, a political science professor tells The Christian Post.
There is currently no clear frontrunner in the GOP race. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney has remained at a steady 20 to 25 percent, while other candidates have risen and fallen throughout the race. Moreover, the Republican National Committee now requires state with primaries before April 1 to assign their delegates proportionally, rather than through a winner-take-all system.
Combined, these two factors have led some to speculate that no single candidate will have a majority of delegates after all the states have voted. This would mean that the delegates would have to pick a candidate at the convention.
If no candidate has a majority after the first vote, delegates – who are assigned to vote for a particular candidate on the first ballot – would be free to vote for anyone. Some have speculated that, due to dissatisfaction with the current field, someone who has not even campaigned for the position, such as former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, could emerge as the nominee.
That is not very likely, though, according to Marjorie Hershey, professor of political science at Indiana University, in a Thursday interview with The Christian Post. Hershey specializes in the study of political parties and elections.
While the early primary states switched, or stayed, with proportional representation, there are still many states that have winner-take-all primaries after April 1.
“If things are muddled in the early primaries ... by April, the winner-take-all primaries should probably make the difference one way or another,” Hershey pointed out.
“Winner-take-all primaries tend to build momentum very fast. In 2008, for example ... in Missouri, John McCain had won a plurality in the primary, maybe one percent more than [Mitt] Romney and two percent more than [Mike] Huckabee and, given that it was winner-take-all, he got all the delegates in Missouri.”
“That really has a profound effect, when Huckabee and Romney come out with zero, having come real close in the popular vote. That's pretty devastating. It has a negative effect on volunteers. It has a negative effect on people who are likely to donate money, and, the process speeds up considerably.”
The media, Hershey pointed out, also encourages the quick selection of a candidate. “Reporters are just driven by the nature of their own profession to want to predict who is gonna win, because that generates career rewards and that means that there will be bandwagons.”
This bandwagon effect, in which the media suggests who the eventual nominee will be, impacts candidates ability to raise money, and thus remain in the race. “The people who want to give money and are trying to figure out who is going to win, because they would rather give money to who is going to win ... then the money totals will be reported by reporters, there's a big increase in funding for so-and-so, and things start to build.”
Delegates and party leaders are not even interested in having a brokered convention, Hershey argues, because it would be damaging to the party. Brokered conventions present to the public an image that the party is controlled by elites.
Brokered conventions appear “party leader driven and so-called 'boss driven' and feeds into an image that, although it's completely inaccurate, has been so long lasting in the American public. We're all so convinced that there are party bosses out there, even though there aren't. It's really easy to trigger that image and that's the last thing that the parties want, to have their party appear to be a boss party.”
I remember watching a brokered convention when I was a kid. It was interesting to watch.
This would only be possible if no one dropped out of the race, when we all know that Bachmann and Santorum will be gone soon, followed by Perry after his South Carolina loss.
As which point it will basically be a two man race between Romney and Gingrich with Ron Paul pretending he can win with his 10% support for awhile.
And in a two man race, Gingrich is ahead of Romney by a whopping 20 points
RE: I remember watching a brokered convention when I was a kid. It was interesting to watch.
When was that?
Defeat is not an option, there will be no hoisting of white flags!
The Voldemort of electoral death-eating GOP cowards.
“As much as the process stinks, it gets all (most) of the surprises out before the general election.”
BUT, only against our guys (remember Obee’s many surprises - which have YET to be completely revealed).
And you just had to spoil it.
“Here we go again — not one vote has been cast yet, and the crepe hangers are going at it already.”
The base is bolting from the grasp of the nomenklatura. The nomenklatura simply wish to impose their nominee on the grounds that the contest will be *gasp* CONTESTED!
Just more detachment from principles and an open fight with a possible upset for little Lord Fauntleroy.
“The pick of Romney will be the death of the GOP and then the death of us all.”
The first part is correct, the second isn’t.
All good points, and why the East coast empty suits, empty heads and dead souls are in a panic mode to somehow, someway derail what looks like is shaping up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.