Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onedoug
Interesting to consider why God didn´t bar female homosexuality in light of patriarchy´s polygamous romps, although they should have been precluded too by the singular nature of Genesis 2:24.

Romans 1:26-27

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

180 posted on 12/24/2011 4:09:35 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie

´Not a New Testament guy....


205 posted on 12/24/2011 8:25:49 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson