Posted on 12/21/2011 5:36:56 AM PST by TBBT
CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa - Just two weeks before Iowas first-in-the-nation precinct caucuses theres a new leader, but the race remains remarkably fluid, according to a new Iowa State University/Gazette/KCRG poll likely Republican caucus-goers.
Texas Rep. Ron Paul has moved into first place the fifth candidate to hold that spot since the mid-August Iowa GOP Straw Poll. The data collected between Dec. 8 and 18 suggest that unlike the previous frontrunners, Pauls support is more solid.
Paul is the first choice of 27.5 percent of 333 likely caucus-goers among the 740 registered Republicans and 200 registered independents contacted by ISU. Thats up from 20.4 percent in an ISU/Gazette/KCRG poll in November. Hes followed closely by former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich whose support increased from 4.8 percent to 25.3 percent. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney came in at 17.5 percent, up from 16.3.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry is the only other candidate to poll in double digits at 11.2 percent an increase from 7.9 percent a month earlier.
(Excerpt) Read more at kcrg.com ...
Much of the conservative problem is that too many conservatives rejected anybody who could actually get support. On the other hand, I hate the idea of Gingrich, so I guess I’m part of the problem.
Because the weak, effete, Republican elite do not want to have to run national primaries where the real will of the American Republicans could overcome there money and influence.
2008 = McCain.
2012 = Gingrich or Romney.
Election after election, the same "hold your nose and vote for X". Until the Republican party is taken over by conservatives, or a third, conservative party arises, voting by conservatives is an exercise in futility.
America committed resources to these conflicts without obvious success. Now the money is gone and we don’t have any more.
When one finds oneself in a hole on should stop digging. Do you believe we have the resources to continue our foreign adventures? Having the fortitude for it is only half the equation.
Reagan brought down the USSR by forcing them to over commit. Are we to be brought low in the same fashion?
No! I’m not saying that. I’m saying that if we intend to survive in this increasingly dangerous world, we need to fortify our position. Our position is weakened when we over extend and over commit. Adversaries will use this to their advantage.
We simply do not have the strength or resources to assert our influence everywhere.
It is not cowardice or appeasment, it is a responsible and reasonable opinion considering the tinder box that is the world.
Bachmann is a Constitutional candidate, probably moreso than the others.
I’m sure I don’t have to tell you that Ron Paul is not my messiah. His high regard for the constitution is the highest tribute he could pay to America.
America’s best chance for survival is a return to Constitutional Government. Many folks are coming to realize that. No amount of name calling or hysterical hyperbole is going to work anymore. Folks realize the gravity of the situation.
I don’t envy your position. The current house of cards cannot stand much longer and I wouldn’t want to be in your shoes trying to prop it up. Good luck with that. Changes are afoot.
I could support Bachmann. As long as the candidate has an unwavering committment to Constitutional Governance, they could get my support.
Thank you for a thoughtful post and for not resorting to hysterics.
I am still waiting for you or anybody else to tell me anything that Ron Paul has actually done to make America a better place. Complaining, making promises, and blaming America for every problem in the world does not make America better. I would just like to hear of one thing he has ever actually accomplished.
Whatever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.