Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
Don't bet your lunch money on it.

Tell you what: I am certain enough that Scalia will rule against Obamacare in March that I am willing to make a serious bet with you. Unfortunately, since I have a policy of anonymity on this website, due to past experiences with psychos, it can not be a monetary wager.

How does this sound? If Scalia upholds the appellate decision, I will voluntarily suspend my account for a month. If he does not, you will do likewise.

67 posted on 12/21/2011 10:22:22 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: presidio9
No.

I am not at all certain how Scalia will vote. He sold out his originalist principles in Raich, so it would not be that big a deal to go against his own opinion in that case.

Keep in mind that two of his protoges did uphold Obamacare based on his opinion in Raich. I simply advised you not to bet your lunch money. You're free to ignore my advice.

69 posted on 12/21/2011 11:55:22 AM PST by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Tell you what: I am certain enough that Scalia will rule against Obamacare in March that I am willing to make a serious bet with you. Unfortunately, since I have a policy of anonymity on this website, due to past experiences with psychos, it can not be a monetary wager.

Won't that kind of take the fun out of gloating for the winner? Just sayin...

86 posted on 12/22/2011 9:52:05 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Liberals draw conclusions on clouds with invisible ink from a unicorn horn dipped in Pixidust!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson