Skip to comments.
Romney on ‘O’Reilly’: Obama is not a socialist
The Washington Post ^
| 2011-12-20
| Erik Wemple
Posted on 12/20/2011 3:58:58 PM PST by rabscuttle385
Edited on 12/20/2011 7:37:06 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
O
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 0; 0bama; 2012gopprimary; afraid; backstabberromney; bhosocialism; coward; cowardice; democrats; fearful; loserromney; obama; obamacare; obamanomics; romney; romney4obama; romneyafraidofbho; romneycare; romneyfearful; romneyisacoward; romneytaxes; socialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-190 next last
He's a socialist, and so are you, Mitt.
FUMR!!!
To: rabscuttle385
I am not sure of the distinction between Socialist and Communist but Obama is the one which is worse.
2
posted on
12/20/2011 4:01:38 PM PST
by
yarddog
To: rabscuttle385
Mitt doesn’t want to give the game away. If he admits Obama is a ‘socialist’, what does that say about him?
3
posted on
12/20/2011 4:02:49 PM PST
by
Tallguy
(It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
To: rabscuttle385
Be nice to barry. That worked out great for McCain.
4
posted on
12/20/2011 4:03:11 PM PST
by
DManA
To: yarddog
You are right. I may not be able to define pornography but I surely know it when I see it.
To: rabscuttle385
Big Government Liberal Democrat = socialist/marxist Mitt.
Come on, you can say the words. It’s past time to quit parsing words and call it exactly what it is.
We owe our kids and grandkids at least that much, and to work our hearts out to turn their agenda around!
Obama is a Marxist Ideologue
http://www.jeffhead.com/obama-time.htm
6
posted on
12/20/2011 4:03:53 PM PST
by
Jeff Head
(Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Tallguy
Mitt doesn’t want to give the game away. If he admits Obama is a ‘socialist’, what does that say about him?It says that he believes he can be the first person in history to make Socialism work. They all believe that. They are killing with it.
To: rabscuttle385
You know, I prefer to use the term that he’s just over his head. Politically it would be disastrous to call a socialist foe a socialist when the caller is a socialist too.
Romney is the best damn chance 0bama has to claiming a 2nd term.
8
posted on
12/20/2011 4:05:12 PM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: rabscuttle385
Willard, if you’re not willing to go ten rounds with The Anointed/Appointed/Seclected One, then we don’t want you. At all.
9
posted on
12/20/2011 4:05:22 PM PST
by
Old Sarge
(RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
To: rabscuttle385
Horse Hockey Mitt and you're OBuzzard on steroids.
10
posted on
12/20/2011 4:05:31 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: Tallguy
what does that say about him?I think the Republican contestants should just start bashing Myth and collectively make the case that Myth is, in reality, Gorden Gekko (from the film Wall Street
The Demoncrats are going to do it sooner or later.
To: rabscuttle385
Has O’Reilly admitted Obama is a Socialist yet?
He poo-pooed the possibility at every opportunity for the past few years.
12
posted on
12/20/2011 4:06:36 PM PST
by
digger48
To: rabscuttle385
How on earth does Romney even get 25% in the polling?
Do people just not get he is just like BHO?
Everyday he comes out with another reason to never consider him in the primary.
13
posted on
12/20/2011 4:06:36 PM PST
by
svcw
(God's Grace - thank you!)
To: rabscuttle385
He’s digging for moderate votes, and praying the Press actually like him. Sucker!
14
posted on
12/20/2011 4:07:13 PM PST
by
theDentist
(fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
To: rabscuttle385
Mitt does not know much about ducks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck . . .
Come on Mitt! Use your head!
15
posted on
12/20/2011 4:07:36 PM PST
by
jonrick46
(2012 can't come soon enough.)
To: yarddog
I am not sure of the distinction between Socialist and Communist but Obama is the one which is worse.
Communism is simply one way of implementing socialism. In communism the means of production is owned by the state. In national socialism, the means of production remains in the hands of the public but the government controls the output and determines who benefits from the profits. - see General Motors for example
16
posted on
12/20/2011 4:07:56 PM PST
by
slumber1
(Don't taze me bro!)
To: rabscuttle385
This state of denial about Obama has been "official" republican establishment policy since 2008. McCain hewed to it, and other, "moderate" flunkies like Bennett and Romney et al still can't bring themselves to face the truth. They have consultants, according to Rush, who caution them not to tell the truth about obama because it will "offend" some idiot in Bumf*k Iowa.
To: Tallguy
That he's been paying attention?
Why shouldn't we call him what he is? The folks over at the Socialist Review claim him as one of their own. Dr. Manning Marable, a lion of the left, openly stated that Obama surrounds himself with communists, independent marxists, and socialists, and is a student of socialism.
Through Obama's Eyes
18
posted on
12/20/2011 4:09:34 PM PST
by
TheWriterTX
(All in now for Newt Gingrich)
To: rabscuttle385
One more nail in Myth’s coffin...as it were.....
19
posted on
12/20/2011 4:11:58 PM PST
by
luvie
(This tagline reserved for a hero.......)
To: rabscuttle385
20
posted on
12/20/2011 4:12:04 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-190 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson