Posted on 12/17/2011 12:08:08 PM PST by Jim Robinson
You bring up something I had thought of when I heard that news. I would be surprised if it didn’t go that way.
you say: “Ditto for NEWT “THE PROGRESSIVE”
Saying a thing doesn’t make it so -
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/gingrichs-unimpeachable-conservative-credential/
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/12/14/newts_past_and_future_leadership_112396.html
Newt didn’t have spend $100,000 to bury his record in office - as mitt did
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/06/us-usa-campaign-romney-computers-idUSTRE7B500X20111206
Why isn’t the press going after him on this?
or this?
http://mrctv.org/videos/mitt-romney-2002-my-views-are-progressive
AMEN and AMEN!
Exactly.
"A Republic if you can keep it."
Well, can we keep it?
In theory, I agree with you. But this SEC Civil Fraud suit was just filed yesterday. The MSM hasn't even had time to react yet or even beginning to connect the dots of a storyline between Syron & Newt. Give it a few days.
And this is just a Civil Fraud Suit against Syron. Wait. "The BB Swami" says that Newt/Syron & Freddie Mac connection stories will start showing up soon, then there will be a criminal indictment of Syron, then it will start really drawing Newt political blood.
My bet is that Newt could well be public relations roadkill somewhere between Iowa and New Hampshire....
Again, I could be wrong, they could do nothing to Newt, but I wasn't wrong about Cain, from Day 1, start to finish while everyone else was attacking his accusers and acting like they weren't credible to anyone.
Obama = enemy You've established this and we agree.
RINOmney = supposed friend who will stab you in the back. Here's where you begin to lose rationality. When you say, "supposed friend who will stab you in the back" you're really saying, "known enemy". That is you've already defined Romney as an enemy and a tactic once understood is no longer a tactic. Do you follow that so far?
Now the real equation is:
Obama = enemy
Romney = supposed friend who will stab you in the back = enemy
Obama = enemy = Romney.
Now you are an anti-Mormon bigot which is why this doesn't seem clear or rational to you. Bigotry does that to the rational mind, hence the irrationality of bigotry. Now I don't expect you to understand this, so have someone who's not an anti-Mormon bigot, but who you trust and see as rational explain this to you before replying again. Do you know someone like that who can help you?
I wonder what would play better in the general election, Newt saying he believes in home ownership or Mitt Romney’s housing recovery plan based on accelerating foreclosures. Can we say Mr. out-of-touch Wall Street corporate raider...
Mitt “Millions” Romney:
“One is, dont try and stop the foreclosure process. Let it run its course and hit the bottom, allow investors to buy up homes, put renters in them, fix the homes up, and let it turn around and come back up.
The Obama administration has slow-walked the foreclosure processes that have long existed and as a result we still have a foreclosure overhang.”
A tea-partier who embraces Romney is the equivalent of a pro-choice Catholic—the embodiment of cognitive dissonance.
Think on this - No. One, Newt will not be led into that old debate format...
And in the general - they will both be running with their VP running mate.
So - who goes up against Plugs?
Newt has expressed he’d like Col. Allen West for his Veep. Now see that ticket in your head. The country will be electrified. Two erudite historians, pro-military, knows who our enemy is and isn’t afraid to go after them, solid Constitutionalists and back down to NO ONE.
Plugs and O’bummers knees will be shaking and their brains will turn to mush - well, mushier.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ8tBHP3_Fo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=Ap4JNqt6rOs&NR=1
You want your REVOLUTION?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M
WRONG! One answer is ROMNEYCARE. You know nothing about Conservatives with a post like that.
I can’t wait to see B.O. get “Newt-ered” in the debates.
Well, Mitt has already lost a Senate race, lost a presidential primary, and become so unpopular as governor that he didn’t even try to run for a second term (the Democrat won the governorship for the first time in about 20 years after him). I guess after all that it is Mitt’s turn to lose a national presidential race. He’s already lost everything else.
I see the t-shirts now. “Newt-er B.O.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.