Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Gingrich's Package deal for the TEA Party Rebellion: Take the White House, take the Senate, continue building the tea party majority in the House, continue taking control of state and local governments, flush the liberal activist judiciary, repeal ObamaCare, repeal/abolish all of Obama's Marxist government, cut and flatten the taxes, reestablish and enforce the tenth amendment, cut regulations, dump the EPA, build the pipelines and drill baby drill, cut entitlement spending by privatizing social security and medicare, cut deficits, balance the budget, drop Obama's idiotic lawsuits against our states, enforce the border, rebuild our military, free our free economy and put our free people back to work!! First with the Reagan Revolution, then the Republican Revolution and now the TEA Party Revolution!! Go, Newt!!

Rebellion is brewing!!

1 posted on 12/16/2011 1:04:22 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Jim Robinson
New Gingrich

New Gingrich? Is that a typo or is that what we're calling him now? You know, the "New" Newt.

2 posted on 12/16/2011 1:07:29 PM PST by RockinRight (If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Good to hear from you...I’ve been getting concerned that I was alone with my feelings/support for NEWT!


3 posted on 12/16/2011 1:08:18 PM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
don’t appear to share the concerns the GOP establishment seems to have about the impact Gingrich would have on downballot races as their presidential nominee

First I've heard that there was any concern about downballot races.

If anything, having any candidate at the top who leaves GOP voters with any sort of queasy feeling will lead to even greater voter intensity downballot.

Plus, most conservatives understand that whoever is President, we must elect as many conservatives to the House and Senate, as well as governorships, as possible. To help push the agenda AND to keep POTUS on track.

4 posted on 12/16/2011 1:09:45 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Great platform JR - I hope he is interviewed at length or preferably buys time to state exactly those proposals.

He has the Congressional knowledge and experience to get it done.

Damn the torpedoes and get Newt in the chute!!!


5 posted on 12/16/2011 1:12:31 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Gingrich - flying solo - without congressional baggage!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt is a commin’...... and thar’s gonna to be a new Sheriff in town.

It’s not just about another election, it’s about the survival of our country and the future of our grandchildren. On this, FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION.

GO NEWT GO.........


7 posted on 12/16/2011 1:14:44 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/Palin-West-2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Well, I for one can only say that Newt energizes me and Mitt demoralizes me. I want to be excited next November, not indifferent about what happens.


8 posted on 12/16/2011 1:16:16 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Snip: “I think what we want at the top of the ticket is someone who’s smart and articulate and is willing to challenge the status quo,” said Mark Meadows, a House candidate in North Carolina.

Go Newt!
10 posted on 12/16/2011 1:17:38 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
I agree. Newt has a lot of payback saved up that he'd like to pass out to the democrat thugs as well as the RINO crew who were against him when he was Speaker so I think he'd be far less inclined to compromise and make deals that some folks seem to think he would be. He'd probably like nothing better than to see a lot of the familiar faces in both parties replaced with Tea Part folks.

Regards

11 posted on 12/16/2011 1:19:20 PM PST by Rashputin (Obama stark, raving, mad, and even his security people know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
"I’ve been telling people all along that Newt is the real thing, and he’s substantially different than when he was Speaker of the House," said Dave Garrison...
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Unfortunately this is true. Newt WAS conservative when he was Mr. Speaker. His record since he left office....
 

Much more liberal.

17 posted on 12/16/2011 1:29:33 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt will bring innovative change, eg; limit judges. Mitt will not shake up the old boy network.


22 posted on 12/16/2011 1:35:16 PM PST by 2007 Crusader (2007 Crusader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt will bring innovative change, eg; limit judges. Mitt will not shake up the old boy network.


23 posted on 12/16/2011 1:35:35 PM PST by 2007 Crusader (2007 Crusader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
First of all--God Bless You, and John, for all you do for the Conservative cause!

And--thanks for this post of yours! It is really encouraging

One thing I wish somebody would shout from the rooftops is how ALL Federal employess--including ALL Congress Critters--DO have PRIVATE Social Security Accounts; it's called the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP).

And I would be willing to bet (a small sum!:)that it has netted all those Dim hypocrites a nice little nest-egg since 1985, when the Fed made it mandatory that all new-hires enroll under FERS--Federal Employment Retirement System, and offered those under the old system-- CSRS (Civil Service Retirement System)--the opportunity to switch over to FERS.

FERS is really just Social Security--BUT anyone who switched over from CSRS in 1985, or who was employed after 1985, was given the opportunity to have a TSP accounts--which allowed them to put a small percentage of their income into (GASP!!) the Stock Market--and other kinds of PRIVATE investment entities, including ones that were high risk--but earned a higher rate of return.

If Newt were to bring this up--it would put the Dims on the defensive immediately, and (I think) shut them up effectively whenever they think about screaming and ranting about "privatizing Social Security.

I know of one Fed employee who, in a short period of 7 years, accumulated $50,000--with only the maximum investment allowed and with matching Fed funds. Just imagine how much moola Frank and Dodd and the other Dim have accumulated in thier TSP accounts! Would make an interesting WaPo article (in our dreams!)

24 posted on 12/16/2011 1:38:28 PM PST by milagro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Actually I believe that Gingrich will at least attempt to make these things happen, the others I know will not even attempt.


28 posted on 12/16/2011 1:45:17 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
I've slipped into a FReaky parallel universe...

Maybe I missed the transition, but when did FR become a place that cheers for Newt Gingrich for President? I guess things have gotten so bad, even he looks good now.

Don't get me wrong, I'll be voting for the (R) no matter what next November -- Obama is a force of destruction that hates our country, but my enthusiasm for upcoming election is completely gone.

Rah-Rah Newt? No thanks.

43 posted on 12/16/2011 1:58:13 PM PST by FightforFreedomCA (we're stumbling towards Romney....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt’s right. Get this show out of the ditch the Dems have driven it into with their total idiocy, and back onto the road.


44 posted on 12/16/2011 2:04:08 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt is not a lawyer, but he knows the LAW better than they do!


45 posted on 12/16/2011 2:04:15 PM PST by PALIN SMITH (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

this is the time that Sarah Palin needs to come out and enthusiastically endorse Newt Gingrich.. her endorsement now would automatically send the Niki Haley, Chris Christi, Ann Coulter ect,ect endorsements of Romney(who wouldn’t be seen with the Tea Party) to the who cares level and put the values of the Tea Party front and center again.. Palin’s endorsement(against the establishment.. let’s remember she threw out the Republican establishment in Alaska) might create an unstoppable Gingrich momentum like Reagan got in 1980 to where Romney couldn’t stop it.. her endorsement would be HUGE


49 posted on 12/16/2011 2:18:14 PM PST by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

You say: “Rebellion is brewing”

Damn straight - ans here’s they guy newt wants for his VP -

This ticket would cause apoplexy within the Establishment pubbie and hari kari would be rampant through Lib-Vamp and the media would turn into Susan “Estrogen” on the night of Bush’s win - drunk, disheveled with tears streaking down their faces.

Here’s the video of Newt’s pick when he was running for
Congress - where he has become the most known new senator - because he says it like it is.

REVOLUTION! “Bayonets”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M

Col West on ‘Palestinians?’ and the “Arab Spring” He ALSO knows history...;o)

http://mrctv.org/embed/aim-allen-west-schools-palestinian-statehood

Gingrich/West - none could beat them


55 posted on 12/16/2011 2:36:51 PM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Love it!!


75 posted on 12/16/2011 3:19:35 PM PST by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I’m enthusiastically backing Newt. I think he’s inspiring and we need a fighter who can eviscerate Obama. One who can articulate a conservative message better than anyone in recent memory, and one who will utterly destroy Obama in debate and in print. Everybody else running as a Republican I’d have to hold my nose and vote for, because they’re all better than Obama, but I’m so tired of settling. I actually am enthusiastic about Newt.


76 posted on 12/16/2011 3:37:19 PM PST by MarcCicero (Go Newt! No more milquetoast Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson