Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones
"O’Reilly, Hannity and Greta have been much fairer. All of them seem willing to defend Newt and often have a quizzical expression on their face trying to understand just why he’s being attacked from so-called Republicans so much. Hannity was very animated last night about being upset and frustrated that the establishment was trying to pick the winner, and said that his audience was overwhelmingly e-mailing him that sentiment."

While I always watch O'Reilley and Bret Bair, I rarely watch Hannity, and never Greta. Many here on FR have given their opinion that Hannity was/is in the tank for Mitt. I did have that feeling awhile back, but I'm not so sure now. But I do believe that Tokyo Rove, Krauthammer, and even Brit Hume, whom I had immense respect for, are totally aghast and apoplectic at the thought of a President Gingrich, or maybe just a Presidential nominee Gingrich.

I'm convinced that Newt is who we need right now, he is a giant among midgets.

1,713 posted on 12/15/2011 11:17:27 PM PST by matthew fuller (Hey Buckwheat- What the Hell are we paying you for?...(GO LEROY!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1695 | View Replies ]


To: matthew fuller

Brit Hume’s eyes almost bug out and he starts talking in a fever pitch whenever he talks about Newt. He seems terrified at the prospect of Newt getting the nomination. O’Reilly has been coming back at him saying that Newt can handle these negative attacks and that America is really looking to elect a “problem solver” this time, whoever that might be, and they won’t be focusing on stuff like the marital issues or stuff that happened decades ago.

I’m trying to remember how all these people felt about Sarah Palin. I wonder if a lot of this comes back to an entrenched mindset that if you don’t have an Ivy League education under your belt and haven’t become a multi-millionaire in the private sector, then you’re not cut out to be a leader in the Republican party. The biggest divide between the Republican establishment and the grass-roots seems to be over class. They certainly seem blind to the fact that Mitt Romney’s status as a Wall Street type of big business tycoon isn’t the most marketable thing to be in this rather anti-Wall Street election cycle.

Hannity and O’Reilly both seem to remain fairly in touch with their working class roots. Hannity definitely is not backing Mitt Romney above other candidates. He’s been trying to be equally fair and defend all the candidates. The only one he’s been negative on is Ron Paul, particularly in regards to his foreign policy. He truly seems most approving of Newt, which could be just because they’ve worked together at FOX for a good, long time. I would say O’Reilly is slightly leaning towards Mitt, because he’s being swayed a little by the electability argument.


1,724 posted on 12/15/2011 11:49:07 PM PST by JediJones (Professor of Palintology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1713 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson