Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn

I’m sorry, but the majority of comments in this thread are just pure horsecr*p.

Michele Bachmann is CLEARLY, CLEARLY, the most consistent conservative individual on the stage. It’s disgusting to watch what is happening to this woman. Everything many here have b*tched about happening to Governor Palin, that is, being accused of being stupid, ignorant, crazy, shrill, is being heaped upon Bachmann, by so called “conservatives”.

The left and MSM have taught you people well to eat one of your own. Alfonzo Rachel of PJTV was spot on.

She DESTROYED Ron Paul tonight on Foreign Policy. Not that that is difficult to do, but did so effectively.

In regards to the “attacks” on Gingrich, get over it. Gingrich SAID he supports some type of program garnered towards making housing more affordable. That’s BIG GOVERNMENT. The GSE’s of Fannie/Freddie should be closed and Michele was right for pointing that out. And don’t give me this cr*p about Newt not being a lobbyist. You know d*mn well what he was doing and that contract was written specifically in the way it was to skirt around the lobbying rules. Nobody is kidding anyone here.

SECONDLY, in regards to the defunding of PP and partial-birth abortion issues, it’s no secret Newt is a “BIG TENT REPUBLICAN” (he has even said so). She called him out because he refused to stop supporting candidates that would not oppose these measures. Does Dede Scozzafava from last year ring a bell?

Face it. Some of you here don’t like Bachmann because her name doesn’t happen to be Sarah Palin. Well, I’m sorry. Bachmann decided to run. Palin did not. And right now, she’s fighting against a “good ole boys” club that wants to put her in her place.

The best moment for Bachmann, though, came when she finally stood up for herself and said that she had had enough of this cr*p with “not having her facts straight”. She d*mn well did. Get over it.

I KNOW in a debate against Obama, this woman would rip him a new one. Why? Because I know she is effective at attacking and defending her position. And she doesn’t have to worry about playing two sides of the issue like Newt and Romney try to do, because she is already on the right side.

SHAME ON YOU! Shame on all of you that continue to call this woman shrill, crazy eyes, and stupid. You are no better than the leftist MSM when you do that. It is YOU who are the true hypocrits when it comes to Reagan’s 11th. YOU only acknowledge that rule when it benefits YOU.

Keep polishing the turd that is Newt Gingrich if you want to, but as for me, I will continue to adhere to my conservative principles and support the candidate that I not only agree with, but with whom I also can trust. I stand with Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin, who I know are a H*ll of a lot smarter and possess better judgement than most here. I challenge all of you Bachmann haters with your personal attacks on her as being stupid, crazy-eyed, shrill, insane, to call Rush and Mark and voice that on the open airwaves. Come on, I’m waiting, I’m sure they’d let you to the front of the phone lines. Because I know that if you said that cr*p about Bachmann to them that you spew here, you would be laughed off the air. Go ahead, call them, I dare you.

18 days to the Iowa Caucuses. I really hope these people get it right and actually let a conservative win.


1,666 posted on 12/15/2011 9:57:13 PM PST by parksstp (Articulate Conservatives look for Converts. RINO's look for Democrat Heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: parksstp
So, you are upset with the entire forum for not loving on your bat wing eyelashed Prom Babe with the Barbie look?..........Get over it.
1,677 posted on 12/15/2011 10:08:31 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp

Like it or not bachmann has done herslf in...and you are wrong to go after Freepers about this...very wrong...many were supporting her.

It doesn’t matter how conservative an indivdual is if they can’t deliver the message to others and persuade them to their thinking. She’s been far too busy slamming other candidates than she has presenting her positions..and that falsely.

Further she’s been coming across desperate..and it shows time and again...addtionally tonight you could see she was “happy” to finally be given opportunity to speak and yet she used too much of that to slam others.

Of course she destroyed Paul tonight...she always picks one or two and goes at it. No surprise she came out swinging this time either.

And for the record...Palin isn’t running...she has nothing to do with Bachmanns own self-destructive comments and behavior. They rest in her own lap.

Additionally....why would anyone bother calling a station on Bachmann...waste of time...and most don’t base their vote on what Lavin or Rush, HAnnity or any of them might think...we do think with our own heads.


1,693 posted on 12/15/2011 10:35:20 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp

I used to like her, but she seems to be in way over her head. What do you want to bet that she comes out in support of Mitt?

Seems to me that she adds nothing to the field. She’s got to know that...


1,699 posted on 12/15/2011 10:41:58 PM PST by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp
Michele Bachmann is CLEARLY, CLEARLY, the most consistent conservative individual on the stage. It’s disgusting to watch what is happening to this woman.

She is a demogogue and a twister of facts. She told us the man who brought two parial-birth abortion bans to the House was a supporter of partial birth abortion because he refused to cut off funds to R candidates who weren't against the procedure. She is either a purposeful liar or too shallow to realize her tendency to form opinions based upon loosely associated groups of facts and has no business anywhere near the reins of power.

1,751 posted on 12/16/2011 3:33:03 AM PST by ez ("Abashed the Devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, "Paradise Lost")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp

I’m sorry, but the majority of comments in this thread are just pure horsecr*p.

Michele Bachmann is CLEARLY, CLEARLY, the most consistent conservative individual on the stage. It’s disgusting to watch what is happening to this woman. Everything many here have b*tched about happening to Governor Palin, that is, being accused of being stupid, ignorant, crazy, shrill, is being heaped upon Bachmann, by so called “conservatives”.

The left and MSM have taught you people well to eat one of your own. Alfonzo Rachel of PJTV was spot on.

She DESTROYED Ron Paul tonight on Foreign Policy. Not that that is difficult to do, but did so effectively.

In regards to the “attacks” on Gingrich, get over it. Gingrich SAID he supports some type of program garnered towards making housing more affordable. That’s BIG GOVERNMENT. The GSE’s of Fannie/Freddie should be closed and Michele was right for pointing that out. And don’t give me this cr*p about Newt not being a lobbyist. You know d*mn well what he was doing and that contract was written specifically in the way it was to skirt around the lobbying rules. Nobody is kidding anyone here.

SECONDLY, in regards to the defunding of PP and partial-birth abortion issues, it’s no secret Newt is a “BIG TENT REPUBLICAN” (he has even said so). She called him out because he refused to stop supporting candidates that would not oppose these measures. Does Dede Scozzafava from last year ring a bell?

Face it. Some of you here don’t like Bachmann because her name doesn’t happen to be Sarah Palin. Well, I’m sorry. Bachmann decided to run. Palin did not. And right now, she’s fighting against a “good ole boys” club that wants to put her in her place.

The best moment for Bachmann, though, came when she finally stood up for herself and said that she had had enough of this cr*p with “not having her facts straight”. She d*mn well did. Get over it.

I KNOW in a debate against Obama, this woman would rip him a new one. Why? Because I know she is effective at attacking and defending her position. And she doesn’t have to worry about playing two sides of the issue like Newt and Romney try to do, because she is already on the right side.

SHAME ON YOU! Shame on all of you that continue to call this woman shrill, crazy eyes, and stupid. You are no better than the leftist MSM when you do that. It is YOU who are the true hypocrits when it comes to Reagan’s 11th. YOU only acknowledge that rule when it benefits YOU.

Keep polishing the turd that is Newt Gingrich if you want to, but as for me, I will continue to adhere to my conservative principles and support the candidate that I not only agree with, but with whom I also can trust. I stand with Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin, who I know are a H*ll of a lot smarter and possess better judgement than most here. I challenge all of you Bachmann haters with your personal attacks on her as being stupid, crazy-eyed, shrill, insane, to call Rush and Mark and voice that on the open airwaves. Come on, I’m waiting, I’m sure they’d let you to the front of the phone lines. Because I know that if you said that cr*p about Bachmann to them that you spew here, you would be laughed off the air. Go ahead, call them, I dare you.

18 days to the Iowa Caucuses. I really hope these people get it right and actually let a conservative win.


So, not many disagree with you. However, reality has it there’s a small chance of her getting the nomination...if she does not, are you staying home and helping Obama or voting for the “R” no matter who it is?


1,757 posted on 12/16/2011 4:28:12 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp
She DESTROYED Ron Paul tonight on Foreign Policy. Not that that is difficult to do, but did so effectively.

She didn't, and you know why? Because Ron Paul's fans love his foreign policy. She's not going to cause any of Paul's followers to question his views, because they are drawn to him precisely because of those views.

People have mentioned her claims that the Gardasil stuff causes mental retardation as an example of her ridiculous attacks, but you know what was truly retarded? Her missing the bigger picture. Gardasil wasn't about a single $5,000 donation, or the tens of thousands that Merck has donated to Perry over the years or somebody claiming their daughter became mentally retarded as a result of the Merck vaccine. It was about the fact that Perry's good friend, former legal adviser and chief of staff Mike Toomey was hired by Merck to lobby Perry, and about Perry signing the Executive Order that stood to make Toomey's bosses a lot of money. It played right into the crony capitalism problems that Sarah Palin talks about - Perry's good buddy goes off to a company that hires him to lobby Perry and then benefits from Perry signing an Executive Order.

It was handed to Bachmann on a silver platter and she threw it away in favor of somebody's daughter's friends's cousin becoming mentally retarded.

I really liked Bachmann, but I can't say that anymore, because right now there are two enemies that the Republicans face: Romney and Obama. Romney is everything she claims to hate, and she has much more in common with Gingrich, yet you would think that she considers Gingrich to be much worse than Romney.

That tells me that either she's out to help Romney or she is simply going to attack whoever the frontrunner is.
1,788 posted on 12/16/2011 7:58:12 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson