To: alex2011
Sounds like Tehran Bob is on the air...
We’re led to believe the drone’s signal was blocked, and in reaction it landed intact at an enemy airbase, without new programming.
I’m thinking the drone had backup programing, but I doubt seriously it included landing intact at a random enemy airbase so an enemy could have pristine access to all it’s technology.
This would make a great thing to place on a small paper, and wrap bubble-gum with.
5 posted on
12/15/2011 10:40:52 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Why back in '88, Conservatives backed Gore in Texas. What Reagan revolution? What laegacy?)
To: alex2011; Tallguy; dragnet2; US_MilitaryRules; DoughtyOne; sam_paine; RitchieAprile
Im thinking the drone had backup programing, but I doubt seriously it included landing intact at a random enemy airbase so an enemy could have pristine access to all its technology. There was also an air crew not too long ago that had extensive backup training, and I doubt seriously that training included landing intact at a Chinese enemy airbase so an enemy could have pristine access to all its technology.
14 posted on
12/15/2011 10:46:55 AM PST by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: DoughtyOne
Were led to believe the drones signal was blocked, and in reaction it landed intact at an enemy airbase, without new programming. Hey, that's basically what they did and in the process obtained a lot of top shelf U.S. technology.
Trust me, the Iranians are a bit smarter than the Iraqis.
15 posted on
12/15/2011 10:47:05 AM PST by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson