[sam_paine]

It’s a fun experiment.

Someone who synthesizes many subjects you call unfocused.

Someone who’s incapable of considering more than one point at a time, I call myopic.

You say tomato. I say fruit with seeds, Italian food and Salsa.

We will play this game again I’m certain.

(PS This thread is ENTIRELY speculation. The only people who are right are those who admit they don’t know. The others are just fun to watch.)

[DoughtyOne]

It’s a fun experiment.  Ha!  *%#@  &<#%%  ##!    ;^)

Someone who synthesizes many subjects you call unfocused.  Not necessarily.  If someone is synthasizing something that edifies, I'm all for it.

Someone who’s incapable of considering more than one point at a time, I call myopic.  Just because someone doesn't buy into you multi-level patchwork at one moment, doesn't mean that they never will.  A person may be myopic once in a while and still not be myopic on a regular basis.  I would also say that a person who refuses to accept that they may have tried to make a comparison and failed, could also be myopic when all is said and done.  One person's charge of being myopic, can easily be another person's realization of clarity in the moment, realizing a failed attempt with very clear perception.

You say tomato. I say fruit with seeds, Italian food and Salsa.  And of course that's the spice of life.  What a boring place this would be if we all agreed on every issue.

We will play this game again I’m certain.  As am I...

(PS This thread is ENTIRELY speculation. The only people who are right are those who admit they don’t know. The others are just fun to watch.)  I agree.

Thanks for the additional comments.