Ok, whatever you want to think. There are pages of documented evidence posted on these Paul threads that demonstrate he is both delusional and dangerous.
There appears no reason to repeat then, as you as an apparent Paul supporter chose to ignore.
You know what? I wish that there were. But there aren't. There are pages of silly "RuePaul" photoshops, some nonsense about "fake eyebrows" and pages & pages of mischaracterizations & distortions of what he said when I've gone back to the original sources on them, demagoguery, and the like.
I understand that there are reasons to love or hate any candidate -- some legitimate, some just because they rub you the wrong way. But most of what I've seen here just isn't a serious analysis of the words and the ideas.
I don't think that we disagree that this country is in deep doo-doo -- economically, militarily, politically and socially. We've got to get serious. If someone has an idea worth looking at --an idea that has a history, and upside & a downside, then I don't care who brings it up. Like I said, Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich or Bozo the Clown. It's about the issue, not the people.
We are in dangerous waters no matter what we choose -- war with Iran, no war with Iran -- what are the up and downsides to each? I just don't want to see us jumping into Iran like we did in Iraq and find ourselves ten years from now regretting that decision -- if the globe is still spinning by then.