Don't you think this means that they are ashamed to have published it; they know it was wrong; and they have done the best they could to correct their error?
ML/NJ
I sure hope so. But that doesn't excuse the fact that they published it in the first place. Their editorial review board read it and had no problem with it until they started getting the criticism. The one good to come out of this is that the comments under the article --whether they came from Christians, Jews or even atheists -- almost uniformly condemned the column as a bizarre, bigoted rant.